Understanding the Coriolis Effect: Paris Gun Shells and Deviation Measurements

AI Thread Summary
The Coriolis effect significantly influences the trajectory of projectiles like the Paris Gun shells, which landed 1,343 meters off target due to Earth's rotation. The deviation is not linear; it cannot be simply scaled down based on distance. The shell's eastward velocity, influenced by the Earth's rotation, causes it to land slightly west of the intended target when fired southward. The relationship between latitude and the Earth's circumference means that the Coriolis effect varies with the sine of the co-latitude, complicating predictions of drift. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate long-range targeting.
restfull
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
According to Wikipedia, the shells of the Paris Gun fired over 120 km landed "1,343 meters (4,406 ft) to the right of where it would have hit if there were no Coriolis effect"...

Is it then correct to say that it would have deviated by 134.3 metres over 12 km, and 13.43 metres over 1.2 km etc etc?

i.e. is it correct that the drift due to the coriolis effect can be scaled down in this way, or is it non linear with respect to distance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
restfull said:
According to Wikipedia, the shells of the Paris Gun fired over 120 km landed "1,343 meters (4,406 ft) to the right of where it would have hit if there were no Coriolis effect"...

Is it then correct to say that it would have deviated by 134.3 metres over 12 km, and 13.43 metres over 1.2 km etc etc?

No.

i.e. is it correct that the drift due to the coriolis effect can be scaled down in this way, or is it non linear with respect to distance

Only if the Earth is a spinning cone. Of course it's non-linear.
 
Ignoring aerodynamic effects on the shell, I would assume it would follow a sub-orbital path and land exactly where it should. It would only land to the "right" if the Earth were treated as flat, and the shell was fired in a certain direction at a certain latitude. Sort of like the difference between rhumb line (consant headin) versus GPS (great circle) navigation.

Another issue would be the speed of the Earth's rotation and the speed, direction, latitude of the shell. Assuming the shell travels at a very high speed, than I assume that the fact the Earth moves while the shell travels through the air isn't going to create that much difference in the flight.

or am I missing the point and there's some other factor in play here?
 
Yes, you are missing the point: the "coriolis force" as cited in the original post. The cannon and shell in it have a certain speed eastward because they are attached to the Earth and the Earth is rotating to the east. If the cannon is fired southward, the impact area is also moving eastward but, in the northern hemisphere, faster- thus, the shell hits slightly to the west of "due south" of the cannon. It may not "create that much difference" but enough: 1346 meters in 120 km.

The amount of "rotation" at any latitude is proportional to the circumference and therefore the radius of the great circle around the Earth at that latitude. That itself is radius of the Earth times the sine of the "co-latitude" (angle measured from the north pole). The distance between the cannon and the point of impact is proportional to the difference in co-latitudes and so the rotation involves a sine function and is not linear.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top