Understanding the Determinant of the Product of Two 2x2 Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter ilikephysics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the determinant of the product of two 2x2 matrices equals the product of their individual determinants. A user demonstrates this by calculating the determinants of two specific matrices and their product, concluding that both calculations yield the same result. Another participant suggests generalizing the matrices by using variables instead of specific numbers for a more formal proof. The initial calculations appear correct, affirming the user's understanding of the determinant property. The conversation emphasizes the importance of a general approach in mathematical proofs.
ilikephysics
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
What is the following question asking?

Question:

Prove that the determinant of the product of two general 2x2 matrces is the product of their determinants.


What I think is that I should come up with two 2x2 matrices.
1 2 2 3 12 15
3 4 and 5 6 multiply them together and get 26 33

The determinant of the product matrix is six. The determinat of the first matrix is -2 and the second one is -3. Multiply -2 times -3 and that is 6. So I proved that the determinant of the product of the two matrices is the product of their determinants.

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here are the matrices

1 2 (1)
3 4

2 3
5 6 (2)

12 15
26 33 (product matrix)
 
Originally posted by ilikephysics
What I think is that I should come up with two 2x2 matrices.
1 2 2 3 12 15
3 4 and 5 6 multiply them together and get 26 33
...
Is this right?
You should probably be more general (let the elements be letters instead of numbers, and then show it). It looks like you've got the right idea, though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top