Understanding the Difference Between Eta Meson & Eta Prime Meson

owenhuang
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am confused by eta meson and eta prime meson . I can not the difference between them .anybody can help me ? who can tell me what are they made up ?
some textbook say that the neutral eta meson is considered to be a quark combination
(uubar+ddbar-2*ssbar)/6^(1/2),but I am still not clear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

it will not help to open multiple threads on the same question. Thanks :smile:
 
ok ,get it !
 
It will not be easy for me to reply right away. From the top of my head, the eta did not have s\bar{s} components. As for the eta', you might be happy to hear that even professional specialists are not sure that there is no glue content in it :smile:
 
humanino said:
From the top of my head, the eta did not have s\bar{s} components.
The top of my head is not vey high this morning :smile:
This is wrong. You might want to take a look (for instance) at On the gluon content of the eta and eta' mesons[/color] where fits to available data are given.
 
thanks !
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top