Understanding the Gravitational Equation: Solving for Time and Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter maria vega
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitational
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the gravitational equation and solving for time and distance in the context of motion under an inverse square law force. Participants explore the relationship between force, acceleration, and distance, particularly in a gravitational context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the differential equation based on the gravitational force and its implications for motion. There are attempts to integrate the equations to express velocity and time as functions of distance. Some participants express confusion and seek clarification on the steps involved.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the integration of the differential equations, and some participants are exploring substitutions to simplify the problem. There is an acknowledgment of boundary conditions that could influence the constants in the equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem and approaches to integration are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of the problem and the need for careful consideration of the assumptions made regarding the force and motion. There is also mention of previous similar problems, indicating a recurring theme in the discussion.

maria vega
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


m----m t = (a, g, m) f = [tex]\infty[/tex]
t = ??

IMG00021-20110323-1227.jpg




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\int dx/dt <br /> dx = \sqrt{}2gm(1/a-1/x)[/tex]

IMG00020-20110323-1216.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So what you have is if the force is inversly proprotional to the square of the distance, what is te time taken to travel from one place to another?
Right, you have:

[tex] F=-\frac{k}{x^{2}}[/tex]

So you get in the differential equation:

[tex] \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=-\frac{k}{x^{2}}[/tex]

However write:

[tex] \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dx}{dt}\frac{dv}{dx}=v\frac{dv}{dx}[/tex]

Now the following differential equation should be:

[tex] v\frac{dv}{dx}=-\frac{k}{x^{2}}[/tex]

Now integrate this to get v as a function of x and then write v=dx/dt and integrate to find t as a function of x.
 
what? I really did not understand am sorry:S can you expand what you tried to say!
 
You're using the equation F=ma, you are told that [tex]F\propto x^{-2}[/tex], so that means that the is a k such that [tex]F=-kx^{-2}[/tex], so we insert this into F=ma, to see:

[tex] ma=-\frac{k}{x^{2}}[/tex]

There are a number of ways we can write the acceleration.

[tex] a=\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]

The one that you will want to use is:

[tex] a=v\frac{dv}{dx}[/tex]

So you are left with the differential equation:

[tex] mv\frac{dv}{dx}=-\frac{k}{x^{2}}[/tex]

Integrate this w.r.t. x to obtain:

[tex] m\int v\frac{dv}{dx}dx=-k\int\frac{dx}{x^{2}}\Rightarrow\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{k}{x}+C[/tex]

I believe you had some boundary condition which could be used to calculate C (I didn't understand them), then you write:

[tex] \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^{2}=\frac{k}{x}+C[/tex]

then you rearrange to obtain:

[tex] \frac{dx}{dt}=f(x)[/tex]

Wnere you find out what f(x) is and then you integrate. Simple.
 
thank you very much, it was very useful
 
So what's your answer?
 
IMG00022-20110323-2000.jpg


I still need to solve this to get my answer
 
So you have to solve:

[tex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{2GM}}\int\frac{dx}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{x}}}[/tex]

I might try a substitution of [tex]x=a\sec^{2}u[/tex] and see what to do from there.
 
Last edited:
Yes, this is a standard integral. We have had this problem I think more than once before, e.g. here

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2622778&postcount=1

from someone who didn't come back before the end. He said he was in Haiti around the time of the earthquake so I wonder... He mentioned weird results, but he was doing it as math, but as you are coming to it from physics you will understand then.
 
  • #10
I think that if I did the substitution correctly I got the answer to t,

t= ((2sqrt(1/a-1/x)/ (sqrt(2GM)) + c

when t= 0, x=a

c= 0

t= (2sqrt(1/a-1/x))/ (sqrt(2GM)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
maria vega said:
I think that if I did the substitution correctly I got the answer to t,

t= ((2sqrt(1/a-1/x)/ (sqrt(2GM)) + c

when t= 0, x=a

c= 0

t= (2sqrt(1/a-1/x))/ (sqrt(2GM)


Don't think so. Something like that thing on the right ((2sqrt(1/a-1/x)/ (sqrt(2GM)) is dt/dx - you still have to integrate it. You noticed that hunt_mat forgot the square root though. :approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K