Understanding the Increase in Rotation Speed of a Coin on a Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sandi Gokul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating Table
AI Thread Summary
The increase in rotation speed of a coin on a table as it begins to stop is primarily due to angular momentum. Initially, the coin spins around a narrow vertical axis, but as it slows down, it tips onto its side, increasing the diameter of its axis of rotation. This change requires the energy to travel a greater distance to maintain the same angular momentum, resulting in a faster spin. Additionally, as friction reduces the coin's energy, its axis tilts closer to the ground, leading to increased torque from gravity and a higher precession rate. Ultimately, the observed faster spin is a result of these physical dynamics rather than an actual increase in rotational speed.
Sandi Gokul
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why the speed of the coin rotating in a table increases when it begins to stop ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is how I think it works.

It's all about angular momentum. As the coin begins to spin it's spinning straight up and down, around an axis which is also spinning straight up and down. The sides of the coin are rotating around the coin's central axis. The energy begins being rotated around the central axis, which has a very small diameter. This sets the angular momentum's base rate.
As the coin slows down, the coin eventually falls onto either side, but the angular momentum continues to cause the perimeter of the coin to roll on its edges. The diameter, however, has now increased from a relatively thin vertical axis of rotation, to what is now the entire diameter of the coin.
Thus, in order to achieve the same amount of angular momentum, the energy has to travel a greater distance. Not just the inside axis of rotation, but now it has to travel around the coin's entire diameter. This causes what you see as faster spin, to cover a greater distance, in a shorter time.
 
The coin does not rotate faster when it begins to stop. It precession rate increases. That happens because as it loses energy due to friction, its axis of rotation tips closer to the ground, and the force of gravity produces a greater torque, which causes the axis to precess faster.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top