Understanding the Inductive Proof Method for Mathematical Statements

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the inductive proof method for the mathematical statement that if x ≥ -1, then (1 + x)^n ≥ 1 + nx for all positive integers n. Participants are examining the steps involved in proving this statement using mathematical induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the structure of the inductive proof, specifically the assumption of the statement for n = k and the goal of proving it for n = k + 1. There is a focus on the manipulation of expressions and the validity of inequalities.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of the inductive hypothesis and the steps needed to show the inequality. There is an ongoing exploration of how to express the relationship between the terms involved in the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that x is greater than or equal to -1, which is a critical constraint for the validity of the proof. There is also a recognition of potential confusion regarding the manipulation of terms in the inductive step.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



We'll show that, if x => -1, then (1 + x)^n => 1 + nx for all positive integers n.

Solution ...
The text goes on to explain that if n = 1 is true, we assume n = k is true, and n = k + 1 is true.

I understand everything until this part:

Since

(1 + x)^k+1 = (1 + x)^k(1 + x) => (1 + kx)(1 + x)

How does 1 + nx where n = (k+1) become (1 + kx)(1 + x)?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
"The text goes on to explain that if n = 1 is true, we assume n = k is true, and n = k + 1 is true."

That shows a confused understanding of what your text is doing. You don't "assume n = k is true". You assume the proposition you are trying to prove is true for n = k. Then what you are trying to prove is that the proposition is true for k + 1.

So your assumption is: (1 + x)k ≥ 1 + kx

What you are trying to prove is: (1 + x)k+1 ≥ 1 + (k+1)x

So you might start by multiplying both sides of your assumption by (1 + x). That will get you the left side of what you are trying to prove and it is your job to show what you have satisfies the right side.
 
So I need to show that

(1 + kx)(1 + x) = 1 + (k+1)x
 
zeion said:

Homework Statement



We'll show that, if x => -1, then (1 + x)^n => 1 + nx for all positive integers n.

Solution ...
The text goes on to explain that if n = 1 is true, we assume n = k is true, and n = k + 1 is true.

I understand everything until this part:

Since

(1 + x)^k+1 = (1 + x)^k(1 + x) => (1 + kx)(1 + x)

How does 1 + nx where n = (k+1) become (1 + kx)(1 + x)?

Well,

(1 + x)k + 1 = (1 + x)k(1 + x), right?

And from your Induction Hypothesis, we have: (1 + x)k >= 1 + kx, right? So, in conclusion:

(1 + x)k + 1 = (1 + x)k(1 + x) >= (1 + kx)(1 + x).
 
zeion said:
So I need to show that

(1 + kx)(1 + x) = 1 + (k+1)x

You can't show that because those aren't equal. But wouldn't ≥ do? Can you show that? Then write the full inequality up nice.
 
Assume:
(1 + x)^k >= (1 + kx)
Then:
(1 + x)^k+1 which equals to (1 + x)^k(1 + x) >= (1 + kx)(1 + x)
since I multiplied (1 + x) to (1 + x)^k to make (1 + x)^k+1, I have to do the same to the other side.

So I have to show that
(1 + kx)(1 + x) >= 1 + (k+1)x

1 + x + kx + kx^2 >= 1 + (k+1)x
1 + (1 + k)x + kx^2 >= 1 + (k+1)x

So the left side is +kx^2 more than the right side
 
Yes. You now have the argument down and understand the steps. And you have what I would call a good "scratch paper" writeup. Having that all figured out, a nice writeup of the induction step argument you have would be to write:

Assume (1 + x)k ≥ 1 + kx

Then:

(1 + x)(k+1) = (1 + x)k(1+x) ≥ (1 + kx)(1 + x)

= 1 + x + kx + x2 = 1 +(k + 1)x + kx2

≥ 1 + (k + 1)x

And you might want to note why it is important x > -1.
 
Ok thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K