Understanding the Kreb Cycle and ATP

  • Thread starter Thread starter tica86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle
AI Thread Summary
The Krebs cycle is an exergonic process, releasing GTP, which is chemically equivalent to ATP, and reducing NAD+ to NADH for ATP production in the electron transport chain. This cycle lowers the system's potential energy by increasing carbon-oxygen bonds and enhances disorder by breaking down larger molecules into smaller ones. The overall reaction results in the release of carbon dioxide and the regeneration of coenzyme A, contributing to a decrease in Gibbs free energy. The presence of individual endergonic reactions is balanced by the use of high-energy phosphate compounds, such as those in glycolysis. Understanding these principles clarifies the energy dynamics of the Krebs cycle and its role in cellular respiration.
tica86
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Having some trouble understanding if the Kreb cycle is exergonic or endergonic?
I know it has to be exergonic because it's releasing ATP?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tica86 said:
Having some trouble understanding if the Kreb cycle is exergonic or endergonic?
I know it has to be exergonic because it's releasing ATP?

GTP is actually is released, which from a potential chemical energy perspective, is equivalent to ATP. The Krebs cycle reduces the electron carrier NAD+ to NADH, which is used in the electron transport chain after the Krebs cycle to create ATP. The overall process must be exergonic, or else we would not have made far past being protoplasm. Individual endergonic reactions in the overall process are generally overcome through the use of highly energetic phophate-containing compounds; glycolysis is the best example of this, where 2 ATPs are consumed but 4 are gained, with a net of two ATP out.
 
What makes a process exergonic? Well, it is helpful to consider the equation for Gibbs free energy: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. Since exergonic processes bring your system to a state of lower free energy (i.e. ΔG < 0), processes that lower the potential energy of your system (ΔH < 0) or increase its disorder (ΔS > 0) will help a process be more exergonic.

How does one lower the potential energy of the system? Well, for carbon-based compounds, the answer is basically by increasing the number of bonds carbon has to oxygen. This is true because carbon-oxygen bonds are much more stable (i.e. have a lower potential energy) than carbon-hydrogen or carbon-carbon bonds.

What about the disorder of the system? One easy way to increase the disorder of a system is to break large molecules into smaller molecules.

Now, consider the Krebs cycle. The cell feeds acetyl-CoA into the Krebs cycle and it releases two molecules of carbon dioxide and regenerates free coenzyme A (CoA). Does this process create products that have a lower potential energy than the reactants? Does the process increase the entropy of the system?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top