Understanding the Law of Reflection in Electromagnetic Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of electromagnetic waves at a planar interface, specifically regarding the relationship between the wave vector components of incident and reflected waves. It is established that the angles of incidence and reflection are equal, leading to the conclusion that the wave numbers for both waves are the same. However, confusion arises regarding the direction of the normal components, as the incident and reflected waves travel in opposite directions. Participants debate the signs of the wave vector components, clarifying that while the magnitudes are equal, the directions must be considered for accurate representation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding vector directions in wave behavior at interfaces.
_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



An electromagnetic wave is incident upon a planar interface at an oblique angle \theta_i, where it is reflected. For the wave vector components parallel to the interface, we have k_{xi}=k_{xr}. Thus, \theta_i=\theta_r. The wave numbers for the incident and reflected waves are equal. Find the relation between the wave vector components normal to the interface for the incident and reflected waves.


Homework Equations



\cos\theta_i=\cos\theta_r

See attached picture.


The Attempt at a Solution



Thus, from the picture, \frac{k_{zr}}{k}=\frac{k_{zi}}{k}\Longrightarrow k_{zr}=k_{zi}.

To me this seems to imply that both normal components point in the same direction, in addition to being of the same magnitude. But shouldn't the normal components have opposite signs, since the incident and reflected waves travel in opposite normal directions?
 

Attachments

  • reflection.jpg
    reflection.jpg
    2.6 KB · Views: 423
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi _Andreas! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
_Andreas said:
Thus, from the picture, \frac{k_{zr}}{k}=\frac{k_{zi}}{k}

I don't understand how you get kzr/k = kzi/k :confused:
 
Hi!

tiny-tim said:
Hi _Andreas! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)I don't understand how you get kzr/k = kzi/k :confused:


It follows from cosθi=kzi/k and cosθr=kzr/k, since θir and k=|ki| = |kr|.
 
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your picture, but isn't cosθi = -kzi/k ? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your picture, but isn't cosθi = -kzi/k ? :confused:

Uhm... can you explain how you get this result?
 
kzi points right? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
kzi points right? :confused:

Sure, but that's in the positive z direction.
 
ah, then isn't cosθr = -kzr/k ? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
ah, then isn't cosθr = -kzr/k ? :confused:

I guess so, and there's my problem. I tend to think of kzr without the sign as the z component of kr.
 
Back
Top