Understanding the manipulation of Laplacian

h_cet
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi;

I am trying to understand the rytov approximation... and when I was studying that, I could not understand a manipilation...

ΔeØ + k2eØ = 0

▼[▼ØeØ] + k2eØ = 0

2ØeØ + (▼Ø)2eØ+k2eØ = 0

I can not understand these manipilations... for a long time, I have searched the properties of laplecian but I could not find any propertiy in connection with laplecian...

So, please explain how this property is working...

thanks already for your helps...

be well...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an application of the rule

\nabla \cdot (\phi \mathbf{F}) = \nabla\phi \cdot \mathbf{F} + \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F},

where phi is a scalar function and F is a vector. For your case, the scalar function is \exp[\Theta] and the vector is \nabla \Theta.

This comes from treating the laplacian as div grad: grad acts on exp(Theta) to give (grad Theta) exp[Theta] by the chain rule, and then the div acts on (grad Theta) exp[Theta].
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top