Understanding the Matrix of Minors

  • Thread starter Thread starter bill nye scienceguy!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The matrix of minors refers to a matrix where each element is the minor of the corresponding element in the original matrix. It is distinct from the adjoint matrix, which involves taking the cofactors—minors adjusted for sign—and then transposing that matrix. To calculate the matrix of minors, one must first identify the minors for each element in the given matrix. The discussion clarifies that while both concepts are related, they serve different purposes in matrix operations. Understanding this distinction is crucial for solving equations like Ax=b correctly.
bill nye scienceguy!
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
can anyone explain to me what the matrix of minors is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it possible you mean the minors of a matrix?
 
no, I've been given the question:

Ax=b.A=(301), x= transverse of {x,y,z} and b=transverse of {5,2,-1}
(132)
(120)

and the first thing it asks me to do is calculate the matrix of minors. is this just another term for the adjoint matrix or something?
 
Well the "matrix of minors" (of a square matrix) would be the matrix where each element is the minor of the number which was in that position, which isn't the same as the adjoint yet.
For the adjoint, you'd have to take the cofactors (which is the minors + sign taken into account) and transpose that. So adjoint = transpose of cofactor matrix.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top