Understanding the Metric Tensor and its dx's in Space-Time

Ben473
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I know what the equation for proper time is in basic Euclaiden space. But when space-time is concerned, I get a bit confused.

The equation is: \Delta\tau=\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}}

I realize that g_{\mu\nu} is the Metric tensor. However i don't understand the dx's and their indices.

Would someone be able to explain these features to me?

Thanks,

Ben.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ben473 said:
\Delta\tau=\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}}

I realize that g_{\mu\nu} is the Metric tensor. However i don't understand the dx's and their indices.

Hi Ben! :smile:

It means dtau² is the linear combination of the dxidxjs, with coefficients gij.

So, for example, if gij is the usual (1,-1,-1,-1) diagonal tensor, then dtau² = dt² - dx² - dy² - dz². :smile:
 
The indexes on the dx's are tensor indexes, which run over the 4 dimensions so that for instance,
x^0 = t, x^1 = x, x^2 = y, x^3 = z

When indexes are repeated high and low, it means take the sum ( as Tiny-Tim has done ).

M
 
Ben473 said:
\Delta\tau=\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}}

can be thought of as
\Delta\tau=\sqrt{ d\vec x \cdot d\vec x }
In the original form, the metric-tensor is explicit.
 
Thanks Tiny Tim, Mentz 114 and Robphy.

Appreciate your help and I understand this equation a lot better.

Thanks,

Ben.

P.S. Nice secret message Robphy!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top