Understanding the Momentum of Changing Electric Fields

AI Thread Summary
A changing electric field alone does not carry momentum; it must be accompanied by an induced magnetic field and a non-zero Poynting vector. The momentum density in an electromagnetic field is defined by the equation involving the cross product of the electric and magnetic fields. Both electric and magnetic fields must be present for momentum to exist, and static fields can also possess momentum if their Poynting vector is non-zero. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both fields together rather than in isolation. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately describing the dynamics of electromagnetic fields.
WaveObserver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is it fair to say that any changing electric field (hence electrodynamic) has momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so.
 
No it isn't. A changing E-field alone does not carry momentum. You have to consider with it the induced B-field and the Poynting vector.

The momentum density stored in the electromagnetic field is given by:

\rho_{EM}=\mu_0\epsilon_0 \vec{S}=\mu_0\epsilon_0 (\vec{E}\times \vec{B})

There's a few pieces of information we can gain from this equation:

1. Momentum can only be stored in a field that has non zero E and B.

2. The fields do not need to be time varying. Even a static field can have momentum, as long as its Poynting vector is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Samson4
Thank you very much GO1.

So in the example I had the Poynting vector would be non zero. But that is not the case for all electric fields and all conditions. If either E or B are zero then you have no momentum.

GO1 do you use a tool for creating latex equations or are you just entering the codes?
 
Your welcome!

Physics Forums, being the great place that it is, has Latex built in:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=386951

You can also click on the \Sigma box on the reply to page to pull up a handy latex code library.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top