Understanding the Paradox of Centripetal Force in a Frictionless System

AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless hollow tube, a ball placed at the center will exit the tube when it is rotated at a constant angular velocity. Despite the absence of radial force, the ball's motion can be explained through Newton's first law, which states that an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by a force. As the tube rotates, the ball experiences tangential acceleration, leading to a change in direction and resulting in a radial component of motion. The lack of inward force allows the ball to move outward, following a tangential path. This illustrates the paradox of centripetal force in a frictionless system.
Mausam
Messages
27
Reaction score
3
If we have a frictionless hollow tube and a ball which just fits into it. All the surfaces are frictionless.

Now if we put in the ball about at the center of tube and rotate the tube about one of its ends with a constant angular velocity ,then the ball swoops out of
the other end .

If we see from the ground frame then no radial force is acting as friction is absent,then how can we explain the motion of the ball.According to Newton's first law we need a force to change the state of motion.

How do we explain this
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mausam said:
According to Newton's first law we need a force to change the state of motion.
Yes, the acceleration will be tangential only (perpendicular to the tube axis), which is not a constant direction in the ground frame.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To expand a bit on what @A.T. has said, the acceleration which is applied now and is tangential now results in a velocity which is tangential now but which is retained and will have a radial component a moment from now when the "radial" and "tangential" directions change.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
hello mausam
Mausam said:
According to Newton's first law we need a force to change the state of motion.
exactly , very reason why the ball pops out , cause there's no force acting inwards to keep its radius const.
ball tries tries to move in one line . think of tangent to a circle , as you move along tangent,you move further away from circle centre
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top