Understanding the Path Difference in Michelson Morley Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the path difference in the Michelson-Morley experiment, particularly in relation to the ether theory. The user understands the time difference derived from the ether frame but struggles with the phase shift calculation in the interferometer frame due to varying light speeds. The book states the path difference as s≈lv²/c², which is clear in the ether frame but not in the interferometer frame. A suggestion is made to consider the difference in reference frame speeds as negligible, implying that the path differences can be treated as a second-order small quantity. This approach could clarify the user's confusion regarding the phase difference calculation.
physiks
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about this.

I know how to derive the expression t≈lv2/c3 for the time difference between the arrival of the two beams due to the presence of an ether, with the Earth moving at speed v through the ether, and l the distance between the beam splitter and each mirror. This can be done so by working in the ether frame or the interferometer frame.

Now, ultimately I want to find the expected phase shift if the ether were to exist. To do so I need a path difference from this time difference. My book says it is given by ct, i.e s≈lv2c2. I understand this in the ether frame, as the light travels at speed c. But in the interferometer frame, it doesn't have this speed, and so I don't understand what's going on there. I'm very confused. From this path difference, it's easy to get the phase difference.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you assume the difference in reference frame speeds is small, so the difference in computed path differences is a second-order small quantity?
 
haruspex said:
Can't you assume the difference in reference frame speeds is small, so the difference in computed path differences is a second-order small quantity?

That would make sense!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top