Understanding the reasoning of this answer

AI Thread Summary
To facilitate better assistance, it's crucial to provide the complete statement of the problem rather than a summary. Clarity in the problem's context, including definitions of variables like ##\sigma##, is essential for accurate guidance. Including references to previous content, such as equations or statements mentioned earlier, enhances understanding. This approach minimizes assumptions and allows for more effective support. Clear communication is key to resolving complex issues.
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
This is exercise from Morin's book of classical mechanics(Q-12.14 in screenshot 2). He asks to calculate force in 2 different frames. I got the answer and it matches with the solution provided(Screenshot 3). However,the forces in 2 frames must be equal since longitudinal components of force are same. Morin provides explanation for this paradox which completely goes over my understanding(Screenshot 1). Can anybody help me in understanding the reasoning of paradox?
Relevant Equations
N.A
N.A
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2019-04-27-09-33-47.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-27-09-33-47.png
    50 KB · Views: 301
  • Screenshot_2019-04-27-09-34-12.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-27-09-34-12.png
    51.8 KB · Views: 312
  • Screenshot_2019-04-27-09-33-15.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-27-09-33-15.png
    25.6 KB · Views: 302
Physics news on Phys.org
Please be more considerate when seeking assistance. It would help us help you if you posted the actual statement of the problem, not your synopsis of it. For example, although I can guess that it involves a relativistic calculation and I understand what ##\gamma## stands for, I have no idea what ##\sigma## is all about and I don't want to guess how it is defined. It would also help to show the "above" as in "##\dots##we have seen above that it is ## \gamma^2 \sigma v ...##"
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top