Understanding the Relationship Between Mass, Spring Deformation and Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter chandran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
When a mass is placed on a spring, it deforms until the spring force equals the weight of the mass, establishing equilibrium. However, once the mass descends, it gains velocity and will continue moving until it comes to rest. This indicates that the scenario is not purely static, as oscillation occurs around the equilibrium point due to the initial kinetic energy. The system eventually stabilizes when the spring force balances the weight, but friction plays a role in damping the motion. Thus, while the compression can be analyzed statically, dynamic factors must also be considered.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
when a mass(mg) is kept over a spring according to statics the spring will deform till the force supplied by the spring(kx) is equal to mg.


But when thought carefully even when the mass descends by some distance(x) when the equilibrium is reached,the mass must have acquired some velocity and it will continue to move downwards till the velocity is zero.

is my thinking correct . So this is not a static problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chandran said:
when a mass(mg) is kept over a spring according to statics the spring will deform till the force supplied by the spring(kx) is equal to mg.But when thought carefully even when the mass descends by some distance(x) when the equilibrium is reached,the mass must have acquired some velocity and it will continue to move downwards till the velocity is zero.

is my thinking correct . So this is not a static problem
You are correct, it will oscillate about this stationary point. However, it will constantly be accelerating towards this stationary point and will eventually come to rest at the point when the force supplied by the spring is equal to the weight of the mass. Therefore, to calculate the compression of the spring the problem can be treated as a statics problem, as eventually the system will come to rest.
 
Last edited:
Of course, in a real spring, there will be friction which will fairly quickly bring the motion to a stop.

By the way, if the mass is m, the "weight" or force downward on the spring will be -mg and the spring will be compressed until -kx= -mg (k is the spring constant) or x= mg/k. The equation of motion of the spring is
m\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2}= -kx- mg
where x is measured from the "rest position" of the spring without force on it.
If we let y= x- m/k, then the equation becomes
m\frac{d^2 y}{dt^2}= -k(y+ mg/k)- mg= -ky
In other words, we can always ignore gravity if we use the "rest position" of the spring with gravity as our 0 position.
 
chandran said:
when a mass(mg) is kept over a spring according to statics the spring will deform till the force supplied by the spring(kx) is equal to mg.
If you slowly lower the mass onto the spring (using an external system, such as your hand, to take up any extra energy) then the spring will compress to the equilibrium point as you state.


But when thought carefully even when the mass descends by some distance(x) when the equilibrium is reached,the mass must have acquired some velocity and it will continue to move downwards till the velocity is zero.
Of course, if you drop the mass onto the spring it will oscillate about the equilibrium point, since there is "extra" energy that remains in the system. (Until friction brings it to rest as Halls explained.)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top