Understanding the Relationship Between Sin and Cos in a Trigonometric Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3.14lwy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between sine and cosine in a trigonometric equation involving products and roots. It begins with the equation n = Π[2 – 2cos(kπ/n)] and derives that 2 – 2cos(kπ/n) can be expressed as 4[sin(kπ/2n)]^2. A discrepancy arises when the book states Π[sin(kπ/n)]^2 = n / [4^(n-1)], leading to confusion about whether this is a typo or a misunderstanding of the equations. The question ultimately asks to demonstrate that Π[sin(kπ/n)] = n^(0.5) / 2^(n-1) by finding the roots of x^(2n) - 1 = 0. Clarification is sought on whether the original question contains an error regarding the denominator.
3.14lwy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Given that


n = Π[2 – 2cos(kπ/ n)] ... (where Π is the product sign , from k = 1 to n-1 )


as
cos2@ = 1 – 2(sin@)^2

then
2 – 2cos(kπ/ n) = 4[sin(kπ/ 2n)]^2 , for k = 1 , 2 , 3 , … n-1

then
n = Π[4[sin(kπ/ 2n)]^2] = [4^(n-1)] Π[sin(kπ/ 2n)]^2

but the book then said
Π[sin(kπ/ n)]^2 = n / [4^(n-1)]

why ?
why is not the sin(kπ/ 2n) but sin(kπ/ n) ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's definitely a typo.It must be the "2" in the denominator.

Daniel.
 
thank you first .


actually , the question is asking me to show :

$ \prod_{1}^{n-1} \sin{(\frac{k\pi}{n})} = \frac{n^{0.5}}{2^{n-1}}

by finding the roots of \ x^{2n} - 1 = 0

is the question wrong or I have made misstake?
 
Again it's the "2" in the denominator missing...As for the equation,solve it and see whether you can relate the solutions to the identity which you have proven.

Daniel.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top