Understanding the Relationship Between Sin and Cos in a Trigonometric Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3.14lwy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between sine and cosine in a trigonometric equation involving products and roots. It begins with the equation n = Π[2 – 2cos(kπ/n)] and derives that 2 – 2cos(kπ/n) can be expressed as 4[sin(kπ/2n)]^2. A discrepancy arises when the book states Π[sin(kπ/n)]^2 = n / [4^(n-1)], leading to confusion about whether this is a typo or a misunderstanding of the equations. The question ultimately asks to demonstrate that Π[sin(kπ/n)] = n^(0.5) / 2^(n-1) by finding the roots of x^(2n) - 1 = 0. Clarification is sought on whether the original question contains an error regarding the denominator.
3.14lwy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Given that


n = Π[2 – 2cos(kπ/ n)] ... (where Π is the product sign , from k = 1 to n-1 )


as
cos2@ = 1 – 2(sin@)^2

then
2 – 2cos(kπ/ n) = 4[sin(kπ/ 2n)]^2 , for k = 1 , 2 , 3 , … n-1

then
n = Π[4[sin(kπ/ 2n)]^2] = [4^(n-1)] Π[sin(kπ/ 2n)]^2

but the book then said
Π[sin(kπ/ n)]^2 = n / [4^(n-1)]

why ?
why is not the sin(kπ/ 2n) but sin(kπ/ n) ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's definitely a typo.It must be the "2" in the denominator.

Daniel.
 
thank you first .


actually , the question is asking me to show :

$ \prod_{1}^{n-1} \sin{(\frac{k\pi}{n})} = \frac{n^{0.5}}{2^{n-1}}

by finding the roots of \ x^{2n} - 1 = 0

is the question wrong or I have made misstake?
 
Again it's the "2" in the denominator missing...As for the equation,solve it and see whether you can relate the solutions to the identity which you have proven.

Daniel.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top