Understanding the Role of Resistors in 555 Astable Oscillators

  • Thread starter Thread starter tandoorichicken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the operation of astable oscillators using the 555 timer IC, specifically addressing the relationship between resistors Ra and Rb. The formulas for duty cycle and frequency are established as Rb / (Ra + 2Rb) and 1/(0.7*(Ra + 2Rb)*C), respectively. It is noted that when Rb is significantly greater than Ra, the influence of Ra becomes negligible, allowing for simplifications in calculations. This approach is beneficial for applications requiring a near 1:1 duty cycle without the need for precise frequency control.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 555 timer IC functionality
  • Basic knowledge of resistor-capacitor (RC) circuits
  • Familiarity with duty cycle and frequency calculations
  • Experience with circuit design and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the design and applications of 555 timer astable circuits
  • Learn about the impact of resistor values on duty cycle and frequency
  • Investigate alternative oscillator designs for specific applications
  • Study advanced timing techniques using capacitors in 555 timer circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, circuit designers, and engineers interested in timer circuits and oscillator design will benefit from this discussion.

tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I have a question about an astable oscillator made with a 555 timer IC. According to a National Instruments website, the off-duty cycle for an astable oscillator is Rb / (Ra + 2Rb) and the frequency is 1/(0.7*(Ra + 2Rb)*C), where Ra is the resistor in between pin 7 and the power source, and Rb is the resistor in between pins 7 and 2/6, and C is the capacitor in between pins 2/6 and ground. I believe this is a standard setup for an astable oscillator. However, I've noticed that oftentimes Rb >> Ra, so my question is, is there a reason for this? Because if Rb >> Ra and you calculate the duty cycle and frequency of your circuit, the influence of Ra in these cases is often negligible.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Most applications want a 1:1 dutycycle. If you set Rb >> Ra then you can approximate frequency to 1/(sqrt(2)*Rb*C) and ignore the duty cycle as it will approximate to 1:1...
Unless your application needs really accurate frequency and 1:1 duty cycle making Rb>>Ra is a good working simplification.
 
I see... thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
23K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K