Understanding the Role of Ro in Amplifier Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter null void
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating key parameters in amplifier design, specifically finding base current (IB), collector current (IC), and emitter resistance (re). The calculations for IB and IC are confirmed, but there is a debate over the correct formula for re, with suggestions that it should be based on input current (IB) rather than collector current (IC). There is also confusion regarding the output impedance (Zout) and whether to include certain circuit components in the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding transistor saturation and the implications of circuit modifications on amplifier functionality.
null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


M.aspx?v=8c69658f5c99a57da89d.jpg


i) I am to find IB, IC and re
ii) Determine Zin and Zout

The Attempt at a Solution



To find IB,

i)

I use the KVL, start from base

V2 = IB R1 + VBE ,
I assume my VBE = 0.7 V
IB = 23.8462 μA

then my IC = IB HFE
IC = 2.3846 mA

For re = 26m V / IC
re = 10.9 Ω


ii)

Zin = RB // Hie
Hie = Hfe re = 1090 Ω
Zin = 1.087 kΩ

Zout = RC...I think this is where i need to use ro, but i have no idea wat is it referring to...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Ro is 1/hoe.
 
If it is 1/Hoe, then the Zout

Zo = ro // RC
Zo = 4.012 kΩ

then i will proceed to the next part,
iii) calculate Av and Ai

Ib = Vin / Hie
Vout = -hfe Ib (ro // RC)
= -hfe ( Vin / Hie ) (ro // RC)

Av = Vout / Vin
=- hfe / hie (ro // RC)
= -368.114 ...Awkward number...

for Ai,

Iin = Vin / 390k + Vin 1090
= Vin (1/390K + 1/1090)

Iout = IRC ...this is correct right?
= -hfe Ib (ro//Rc)/Rc

Ai =( -hfe/ hie)(ro//Rc)/Rc
= -93.053

Is all these working step correct?
 
Last edited:
You have used a factor hfe in some places where strictly the proper factor should be (hfe+1). For example you have:

Hie = Hfe re

but it should actually be Hie = (Hfe+1) re

Other than this, which leads to a very small error in some calculations (an error which is negligible if hfe is large), your answers are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Check your re. Do you have the correct formula?

Not sure if Zo is meant to include C1 or not. Same for Zin and C2, come to think of it.

EDIT: actually, this circuit is saturated: the collector current computes to 100*(9.3V/390K) = 2.3846 mA which x 4.3K = 10.25V which exceeds the collector supply.
 
Last edited:
rude man said:
EDIT: actually, this circuit is saturated: the collector current computes to 100*(9.3V/390K) = 2.3846 mA which x 4.3K = 10.25V which exceeds the collector supply.

yeah i, but it still asking for amplification...

and about the re, do u mean the Ebers–Moll equation? Well, i still don't know how to use it yet, so i wil syick with the 26mv/ic approximation first.
 
null void said:
yeah i, but it still asking for amplification...

Amplification is zero.

You might have the right formula for re after all, I don't know your model.
 
rude man, were you referring to the fact that the usual formula for re is re = 26m V / IE rather than re = 26mV / IC?

Of course, if hfe is large, the difference is usually negligible, and somewhat variable since different people choose different values for the thermal voltage; sometimes 26 mV, sometimes 25 mV, etc.
 
null void, tell your instructor that you noticed that the transistor is saturated, so you assumed that V1 is actually 12 volts! :biggrin:

Or to really impress the instructor, tell him you analyzed a slight variation in the circuit, namely that V2 is gone and R1 is connected from collector to base.
 
  • #10
The Electrician said:
rude man, were you referring to the fact that the usual formula for re is re = 26m V / IE rather than re = 26mV / IC?

Of course, if hfe is large, the difference is usually negligible, and somewhat variable since different people choose different values for the thermal voltage; sometimes 26 mV, sometimes 25 mV, etc.

No, I had in mind re = 26mV/ib but that was probably wrong. As I said, i didn't know the OP's model.

EDIT: 26 mV/ib is the input impedance to a decently-biased BJT (Vce between say 1V and 20V):

Ic = Is exp(Vbe/Vt)
∂Ic/∂Vbe = Is (1/Vt) exp(Vbe/Vt) = Ic/Vt
1/Zin = ∂Ib/∂Vbe by definition = (1/β) ∂Ic/∂Vbe = (1/β)(Ic/Vt)
Zin = Vt/(Ic/β) = Vt/Ib = 26mV/Ib
 
Last edited:
  • #11
The Electrician said:
Or to really impress the instructor, tell him you analyzed a slight variation in the circuit, namely that V2 is gone and R1 is connected from collector to base.

That would actually be a viable circuit! (the one with 12V Vcc is too dependent on beta).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #12
If i add a resistor at the emitter to the circuit and change the V1 and V2, is it possible that for the Vce to become negative value, is this also a case of saturation?
 
  • #13
null void said:
If i add a resistor at the emitter to the circuit and change the V1 and V2, is it possible that for the Vce to become negative value, is this also a case of saturation?
A negative value for VCE would mean the circuit bears no resemblance to an amplifier.

An emitter resistor would allow a more stable design, but choose a lower value for V2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
23K
Replies
25
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Back
Top