Understanding the spectrum of frequencies

AI Thread Summary
Sound waves are cyclical vibrations that require a medium to propagate, while electromagnetic (EM) waves do not need a medium and are fundamentally different in how they transmit energy. Although both sound and EM waves can occupy similar frequency ranges, they are distinct phenomena and not interchangeable, even at high frequencies. For example, while lightning generates both sound and EM waves, the human ear can only detect sound waves, not the EM waves, which can travel much farther. The confusion often arises from graphical representations that show both types of waves on the same frequency scale, but this does not imply they are related. Ultimately, sound and EM waves are separate entities, each with unique properties and mechanisms of propagation.
Jacobim
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
What is the distinction between EM waves and Sound waves.

I know that sound is cyclical vibrations in some sort of medium. When the frequency increases, do these vibrations become EM waves?

I know that EM waves do not need a physical medium. But they are still energy, and sound is energy. So do they belong on the same diagram showing freqencies?

Are sound and EM waves completely separate things, or are they the same things but at different frequencies?

For instance, the frequency of an AC circuit. 60 hz. Does this produce a 60 hz sound wave in the air from the wire vibrating?

No it does not, be cause the thing that is oscilating is the potential in the conductor.

Is there some crossover point where energy vibrates in the EM spectrum and not in the sound spectrum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jacobim said:
What is the distinction between EM waves and Sound waves.
They are no more related to one another than they are to ocean waves, or to the swaying of trees in the wind. Many different things can move back and forth for many different reasons, and the only thing they have in common is that they're waving back and forth.

I know that sound is cyclical vibrations in some sort of medium. When the frequency increases, do these vibrations become EM waves?

I know that EM waves do not need a physical medium. But they are still energy, and sound is energy. So do they belong on the same diagram showing freqencies?

Are sound and EM waves completely separate things, or are they the same things but at different frequencies?
No, no, and completely separate.
 
Understanding the spectrum of frequencies
What is the distinction between EM waves and Sound waves.

I know that sound is cyclical vibrations in some sort of medium. When the frequency increases, do these vibrations become EM waves?

No. The method by which energy propagates is totally different.

I think what's confused you is that they are sometimes shown on graphs that show sound down one end and light at the other. All these scales are trying to do is show the relative frequency range they occupy HOWEVER they don't do a very good ...

For example lightning generates both sound and electromagnetic waves in the 0-10KHz range. You can hear the sound waves because the ear is designed to detect air pressure waves. You can't hear the EM waves even though they are in the same frequency band because the ear is not a radio reciever. The sound waves produced by lightning propagate a relatively short distance through the air whereas the EM waves can be detected thousands of km away... if you have a radio reciever that convert the EM waves produced by lightning radio waves into sound waves..

http://theinspireproject.org/default.asp?contentID=1

So..

Are sound and EM waves completely separate things, or are they the same things but at different frequencies?

They are different things.

They can be at the same frequency or different.
 
Could it be said that the eye is a radio reciever?
 
Only (?) in that it also detects electromagnetic waves.

I believe the detection mechanisim in the eye involves complex chemical reactions rather than purely electrical processes.
 
Jacobim said:
Could it be said that the eye is a radio reciever?

No, "radio" is a specific band of the electromagnetic spectrum and the human eye does not respond to those frequencies.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top