"Understanding the Spin Quantum Number -1/2 & +1/2

AI Thread Summary
The spin quantum number for electrons is either +1/2 or -1/2 because electrons are fermions with half-integer spin. This intrinsic property allows for two possible orientations of spin, reflecting their behavior in magnetic fields. The values correspond to the direction of spin along a chosen axis, typically the z-axis, where the magnetic quantum number indicates the projection of spin. Unlike other quantum numbers that differ by whole integers, the spin quantum number's half-integer nature is unique to fermions. Thus, the distinction between +1/2 and -1/2 is fundamental to understanding electron behavior in quantum mechanics.
i.mehrzad
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why is the spin quantum number either +1/2 or -1/2


Homework Equations


N.A.


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure but this is the way i thought of it.

Whatevrr quantum numbers i have known of so far: Principal, Azumithal tc. all of them have a diffrence of one between any two consecutive quantum numbers. Therefore the magnitude of the quantum numbers are +/- 1/2.

Same magnitude because the the electrons are the same in all respects.Negative because the elecrons are spinning in opposite direstions.

This explanation has no mathematical backup and is just by observation and just wanted to know wether the observation was good enough.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is not true.

Spin is an instritinc quantity of a particle, and there are many different particles. Bosons, who has integer spin; 0,1,2,..

Fermions has half-integer spin; 1/2 ; 3/2 ; ...

Now the direction of the spin, the so called "magnetic quantum number" in many atomic physics text; is the m_l. Which obeys, precisely as the quantum number l does; m_s = -s, -s +1 , ..., 0, ... , s-1, s.

The s and l is the magnitute of the spin, and the m_l and m_s is the direction (the magnitude of the spin/angular momentum projected on the z-axis, the z-axis is just a convention)

Now, electrons are fermions with spin 1/2, the possible values of that spin in the z-direction is -1/2 and 1/2
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top