Understanding Thermodynamic Potentials: Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of thermodynamic potentials and their differentials in both homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. It questions whether the inequalities for internal energy, enthalpy, Helmholtz free energy, and Gibbs free energy hold true for multiple subsystems and under varying pressures and temperatures. The conversation also explores the connection between inequalities and irreversible processes, suggesting that inequalities may not apply to homogeneous systems due to their dependence on two thermodynamic variables. Additionally, the relationship between the minimum values of potentials and equilibrium states is examined, with a specific emphasis on whether minimizing potentials can reliably indicate equilibrium. The need for references to support claims about the nature of these inequalities is highlighted.
Lojzek
Messages
246
Reaction score
1
I have some questions about thermodynamic potentials (internal energy U, enthalpy H, Helmholz free energy F, Gibbs free energy G):

1. The differentials of potentials:

dU<=TdS-pdV
dH<=TdS+Vdp
dF<=-SdT-pdV
dH<=-SdT+Vdp

Do this equations apply only for a single homogeneous system or can they be used for a system composed of several different subsystems?

Example: Let's have N subsystems, each respecting the equation
dUi<=TidSi-pidVi

Considering
U=\sumUi
S=\sumSi
V=\sumVi,

does it always follow that dU<=TdS-pdV? I think I can prove this if all pressures and
temperatures are equal. Can this equation also be used if pressures and temperatures of subsystems are not equal? In this case, should we use the outside temperature and pressure for the equation corresponding to the whole system? Can similar generalization be used for other potentials?

2. In which cases the can we get inequalities like dU<TdS-pdV? Do inequalites have
anything to do with irreversible processes (how do we explain the connection)? Also can we get inequalites if we only have one homogeneous system (I suppose not, since the state of such system is completely determined by two thermodynamic variables)?

3. What are the relations between minimum values of potentials and equilibrium states?
Can we determine equilibrium states by minimizing potentals?

Example:
dF<=-SdT-pdV
If T and V are constant, then
dF<0
I think this means that F can no longer change once it reaches its minimum, so its minimum is an equilibrium state. But it does not seem obvious that this is the only possible equilibrium state.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of these relationships are correct with the less than sign present. They are all equalities. Is there a reference that says that they are not.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top