Understanding Torque in Gyroscopes: A Question of Reference Frames

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding torque in gyroscopes, specifically regarding the relationship between angular momentum (L) and torque (dL/dt). The participants explore whether the torque of the flywheel and the gyroscope's precession torque can be accurately represented using the given equations. Dimensional analysis is suggested as a method to verify these assumptions. The conversation also touches on the importance of reference frames, questioning whether one is inertial and the other fixed in the body. Clarifying these concepts is essential for accurately analyzing gyroscopic motion.
Distance31
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a college student currently working on a physics project involving gyroscopes. Using the equation below (taken from Wikipedia), am I correct in assuming that dL/dt is the torque of the flywheel and that ω x L is the torque of the gyroscope around the axis of precession?

e485ca275cca7135a34fb07cada3bf0a.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try a dimensional analysis to check?
 
I know Simon Bridge probably did not want to give away the problem and suggested you try dimensional analysis. I will try another tack. Perhaps you can consider whether the reference frame for the "total derivative" term on the right of the first equal sign is related to the reference frame where the torque is equal to the sum of terms on the left of the first equal sign. Is one reference frame inertial? Is one fixed in the body?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top