Understanding Uncertainty Principle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, specifically exploring the relationship between the measurement of position and momentum of particles. Participants are examining the implications of measuring one property accurately while affecting the other, and they seek to understand methodologies for measuring momentum without regard for position accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the uncertainty principle as a fundamental limit, asserting that it is not merely a measurement issue but an inherent property of quantum systems.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about how to measure momentum accurately after determining position, seeking clarification on the process involved.
  • A participant suggests that for photons, momentum can be measured precisely by determining energy or frequency, mentioning techniques like using ensembles of photons or laser beams to achieve this.
  • There are references to various measurement techniques, including the use of frequency-sensitive photodetectors and methods involving prisms for measuring deflection angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methodologies for measuring momentum after position, and there is ongoing confusion regarding the implications of the uncertainty principle. Multiple viewpoints are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in their understanding of measurement techniques and the nature of the uncertainty principle, indicating a need for further clarification on the relationship between position and momentum measurements.

mananvpanchal
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I want to understand uncertainty principle.

I understand that when we measure x accurately we cannot measure p with that accuracy.
The process of measuring x accurately might like this: some detector fires high energy photon to that small particle, and we can know x accurately. But the high energy photon can change momentum of the particle.
But, when we fires low energy photon to that particle we get fuzzy region of probability for that particle.

Now, I want to understand how can we get accurate momentum by getting fuzzy region of the particle? What might be the process to get it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, All

Why my question is unanswered? Please, tell me what is wrong in my understanding. Please, correct me if some thing I misunderstood.

Thanks.
 
I can't help you with methodology for measurements, but I will point out that the UP is NOT a measurement phenomenon. That is, it is NOT a problem that we just don't have the right kind of measurement equipment, it is that it is impossible, regardless of measurement technique, to get arbitrarily precise measurements of BOTH position and momentum at the same time.

There are many threads on this forum that discuss this. I suggest a forum search.
 
phinds said:
I can't help you with methodology for measurements, but I will point out that the UP is NOT a measurement phenomenon. That is, it is NOT a problem that we just don't have the right kind of measurement equipment, it is that it is impossible, regardless of measurement technique, to get arbitrarily precise measurements of BOTH position and momentum at the same time.

There are many threads on this forum that discuss this. I suggest a forum search.

I have searched forum, but I don't get exactly what I want.
I am not talking about measurement phenomenon, or measurement equipment.

My question is: We can determine precise position of a particle, but in this act we change its momentum.
Now, I want to measure momentum precisely, I don't care about preciseness of position now. How can I do that?
 
If your particle is a photon, for example, you can measure its momentum precisely by measuring its energy and/or frequency precisely. There are many ways of doing this (for example, pure gases only absorb light of very specific frequencies; you could use this fact to build frequency-sensitive photodetectors).

With things like conventional photodetectors, though, they are already well-localized in space so you can't measure a precise frequency for a single photon. A way to get around this is to use an ensemble of photons, all with the same momentum (e.g. a laser beam) to get a precise frequency. A laser beam is 'smeared' out in one dimension, so a precise frequency can be calculated for it.

Frequency measurements on laser beams are done a variety of ways. One way is to pass the beam through a prism and record the deflection angle. There are more precise ways, of course, but they are a little technical.
 
IttyBittyBit said:
If your particle is a photon, for example, you can measure its momentum precisely by measuring its energy and/or frequency precisely. There are many ways of doing this (for example, pure gases only absorb light of very specific frequencies; you could use this fact to build frequency-sensitive photodetectors).

With things like conventional photodetectors, though, they are already well-localized in space so you can't measure a precise frequency for a single photon. A way to get around this is to use an ensemble of photons, all with the same momentum (e.g. a laser beam) to get a precise frequency. A laser beam is 'smeared' out in one dimension, so a precise frequency can be calculated for it.

Frequency measurements on laser beams are done a variety of ways. One way is to pass the beam through a prism and record the deflection angle. There are more precise ways, of course, but they are a little technical.

Thanks IttyBittyBit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
974
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K