Understanding Valleys in the Conduction Band

cr2504life
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi and thanks for reading,

I don't really understand the valleys in the conduction band, in the E vs. k diagram, there is the L-valley, r-valley and X-valley. Each has a different momentum... and are at different energy levels.

I understand that at any temperature above absolute zero, a small fraction of electrons will acquire enough energy to jump to the conduction band (overcome the energy gap Eg).

The GaAs bandstructure here:
421.gif

http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/GaAs/bandstr.html

I assume most electrons which acquire enough energy will jump to the lowest valley in the conduction band (r-valley for GaAs).

Ive been trying to determine what is the 'effective' temperature necessary to move an electron from the r-valley to the L-valley, the difference is 0.29 eV in GaAs.
Is the additional thermal energy comming from E = kT ?
... therefore T = 0.29eV*q/(k) ? this is a large temperature ... this seems too large ~3,600 °K.

How do the electons move between valleys ? And how does one find the required energy for this to take place ?
Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Although you can tell the required amount of energy an electron needs to jump from valance band top to the conduction band top, you cannot straightforward associate a temperature for this using E=kT. The electrons in a solid are distributed according to Fermi distribution function. And even in the room temperature (kT=0.026meV) a portion of the the Fermi function will reach conduction band. Hence quite handful of electrons will occupy above the conduction band.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi–Dirac_statistics
 


I see from the solution now that the 'effective' temperature of an electron which moves from the r-valley to the L-valley is equal to T = 0.29eV*q/k ~ 3600 K, I had done this correctly.
 


cr2504life said:
I see from the solution now that the 'effective' temperature of an electron which moves from the r-valley to the L-valley is equal to T = 0.29eV*q/k ~ 3600 K, I had done this correctly.

Math correct, physics wrong. Think about it, 3600 K, most likely GaAs is a vapour at that temperature, the melting point is 1240 C (1530 K). For an electron to move between the \Gamma-point and L-point of a lattice requires a phonon assist.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top