Understanding Vapor Pressure in Open Systems

Click For Summary
Vapor pressure is defined as the pressure exerted by a gas in equilibrium with its liquid phase, and it is a unique function of temperature. In a closed system, when a single chemical species is present, the vapor pressure equals the pressure above the liquid, and no bubble formation occurs at equilibrium. In an open system, the partial vapor pressure at the liquid interface can differ from that in the surrounding gas, allowing for evaporation. At the boiling point, the vapor pressure equals atmospheric pressure, enabling bubble formation within the liquid, which expands and pushes against the atmosphere. Understanding vapor pressure is essential for grasping the dynamics of phase changes and boiling processes.
  • #31
Borek said:
You have not answered my questions:
Gas was mentioned only to show that your earlier notion (about different temperatures at different points) is wrong. Fact that kinetic energies of molecules in a phase are different doesn't imply that the temperatures in different places are different. It clearly doesn't work this way for gases, why should it be true for liquids?

OK, two points seem to be in this issue of discussion, energy distribution in gas phase particles and energy distribution in liquid phase particles. Gases 1st: While it's true the Boltzman-Maxwell distribution of particle energies vs numbers of particles is an illustration of particle energy distributions, it is a common understanding that the Kinetic Energy of a mole of any gas equals (3/2RT). This suggests that Kinetic Energy (homogeneous gas-phase system) is directly proportional to Temperature and changes in Kinetic Energy would, in fact, demonstrate different temperature values. The average kinetic energy of a molecule, which by definition is (1/2mv2), is obtained by dividing (3/2RT) by Avogadro's number, NA. This gives gas phase kinetic energy as (1/2mv2 = (3/2RT/2NA) that is, according to this equation, temperature dependent.

2nd, liquid phase: In a sample of homogeneous a single component system in liquid phase, the energy content is described by (mc∆T) and has a temperature change factor included. However, when a system is in phase transition;i.e., liquid phase => vapor phase, energy input goes exclusively to providing the kinetic energy to effect vaporization and temperature change is not observed under such circumstance. The results of a common experimental investigation of this issue is verified in the 'Heating Curve' for a given mass of water. Tracing, say energy change as a function of temperature change of a finite mass of water from below freezing to a few degrees above boiling (liquid-gas transition) reveals that single phase components demonstrate a temperature change with the input or extraction of heat. However, when two phases are in contact, no temperature change is observed and heat content (Kinetic Energy) for the entire mass quantity of interest is given by (m∆Ht), where ∆Ht is the phase change transition constant. This energy is uniform and distributed homogeneously throughout the liquid-phase system so long as energy input continues and no changes in atmospheric pressure are imposed. Here is a link that may better clarify energy changes observed experimentally. http://chemistry.bd.psu.edu/jircitano/heatcurv.html I specifically direct your attention to 'Step 2' statement, "The heat does not increase the kinetic energy of the molecules, so the temperature remains constant. As long as there are H-bonds to break (as long as there is solid present), the temperature cannot increase". Also, here's another link that applies the Boltzman-Maxwellean Distribution to factors required for reaction initiation including phase transition issures. http://www.chemunlimited.com/The Arrhenius Equation.html
Hope this helps, jp
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't think this helps because we all agree with this. What we don't agree with is that the kinetic energies of all the molecules in a thermally homogeneous liquid are identical to one another, particularly at the boiling point. This was our (Chet, Borek, Russ) understanding of what you were saying. If it wasn't what your were saying, please excuse us for our misinterpretation. Please clarify.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
27K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K