Understanding White Noise Behaviour in an Ideal Mixer - SNR Unchanged"

  • Thread starter Thread starter diemilio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of white noise when processed through an ideal mixer, specifically addressing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Participants confirm that the SNR remains unchanged from input to output, as the ideal mixer does not introduce additional noise. The confusion arises from the assumption that white noise can be expressed in terms of in-phase and quadrature components, which are not correlated. The consensus is that all components of the signal and noise maintain their relative relationships during mixing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of signal processing concepts, particularly mixing techniques.
  • Familiarity with white noise characteristics and its spectral properties.
  • Knowledge of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and its implications in communication systems.
  • Basic principles of in-phase and quadrature (I/Q) components in signal analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of ideal mixers and their impact on SNR.
  • Explore the properties of white noise and its representation in the frequency domain.
  • Study the correlation between in-phase and quadrature components in signal processing.
  • Investigate the effects of non-ideal mixers on SNR and overall system performance.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, signal processing specialists, and students studying communication systems who seek to understand the implications of mixing white noise in ideal conditions.

diemilio
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a question regarding the way white noise behaves when passed through an ideal mixer.

Picture the system shown in the attached image. Assume the mixer is ideal and that the high frequency contents of the multiplication are filtered out. Therefore the output of the system will be A*B/2. My question is, how does wide-band white noise behave when passed through the mixer?

In several textbooks, I've seen that in this system the signal-to-noise ratio remains unchanged from input to output. However, I am confused because I would think that in the case of white noise, it would be possible to express the signal as a composition of in-phase and quadrature components with equal power spectral densities, thus part of the noise should be, phase-filtered.

Is this an unreasonable assumption? Isn't the phase of white noise also white, thus 0º and 90º components are equally probable?

What am I missing here? Why is the SNR unchanged?

Regards,

diemilio
 

Attachments

  • Mixer.png
    Mixer.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 485
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't understand "in-phase and quadrature components with equal power spectral densities". Why do you think they would be equal? (asking, not testing you). I don't think the in-phase and quadrature components are in any way correlated. (I'm not an expert)

Are you thinking that when you mix to zero the resulting pos and neg frequencies add and might cancel? That would only happen to the extent they are correlated.
 
diemilio said:
What am I missing here? Why is the SNR unchanged?

Regards,

diemilio

Why would you expect the SNR to be changed at all (apart from a finite amount of added noise from the mixer)? Every baseband component (signal and noise) will find itself mixed up to a corresponding 'product' component and they should all have the same relationship to each other. Are you looking for something more than that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K