Understanding Work: Conceptualization and Misconceptions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conceptualization of work in physics, particularly regarding a block being raised against gravity. The work done on the block by the applied force is correctly identified as FD, while the work done by gravity is -MgD, reflecting their opposing directions. The net work done on the block is indeed (F-Mg)*D, confirming the relationship between net force and displacement. The conversation also explores whether the block does work on the person applying the force and on the Earth, concluding that while the block exerts a force on the Earth, the work done is negligible compared to the work done on the block. Overall, the discussion clarifies the definitions and relationships of work in different frames of reference.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Question about "work"

I believe I might have a fundamental misconception about work. Please correct me where my reasoning is wrong so I can improve my conceptualization.

Let's say there is a block of mass M being raised. The gravitational acceleration is assumed to be a constant, g. Thus, the weight of the block is Mg.

Let's say that two forces are acting on the block, both of which are constant:
- The external force, F, which causes the block to rise.
- Gravity, Mg, which tends to cause the block to fall.

Assume that F > Mg. Thus, a resultant force of magnitude (F-Mg) causes the block to accelerate upwards.

If the block travels an upward distance of magnitude D, then am I correct in saying that the work done on the block by the applied force is MgD ? This should be a positive number, right? Since the applied force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block?

On the other hand, the work done on the block by gravity should be equal to -MgD right? Since gravity and the block's displacement are in opposite directions, this quantity should be negative?

Also, can we conclude that the net work done on the block is equal to (F-Mg)*D. In other words, can we say that the net work done on any object equals the dot product of the net force acting on it (assuming the net force is constant) and its displacement.

Now comes the difficult part...

Does the block do work on the agent of the applied force? So if I am the agent that is raising the block with my upward force F on the block, can I say that the block is exerting a downward force of F on me? And since the block's displacement is D directed upwards relative to me, can I say that my displacement relative to the block must be D directed downards? Thus, can I say that the block did some work on me? Will this work be equal to the work I did on the block?

Similarly, does the block do any work on the Earth? After all, the block exerts an equal and opposite force Mg on the Earth causing it to slightly push downwards?

Wherever I am wrong, please provide a reason where my reasoning is flawed.

Thanks! All help is appreciated!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't see anything you've gotten wrong with anything you said.
 


Bipolarity said:
Assume that F > Mg. Thus, a resultant force of magnitude (F-Mg) causes the block to accelerate upwards.

If the block travels an upward distance of magnitude D, then am I correct in saying that the work done on the block by the applied force is MgD ?
The work done by the applied force is FD, not MgD.

This should be a positive number, right? Since the applied force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block?
Correct.

On the other hand, the work done on the block by gravity should be equal to -MgD right? Since gravity and the block's displacement are in opposite directions, this quantity should be negative?
Correct.

Also, can we conclude that the net work done on the block is equal to (F-Mg)*D. In other words, can we say that the net work done on any object equals the dot product of the net force acting on it (assuming the net force is constant) and its displacement.
Correct.

Now comes the difficult part...

Does the block do work on the agent of the applied force? So if I am the agent that is raising the block with my upward force F on the block, can I say that the block is exerting a downward force of F on me? And since the block's displacement is D directed upwards relative to me, can I say that my displacement relative to the block must be D directed downards? Thus, can I say that the block did some work on me? Will this work be equal to the work I did on the block?

Similarly, does the block do any work on the Earth? After all, the block exerts an equal and opposite force Mg on the Earth causing it to slightly push downwards?
A block falling toward the Earth under gravity force Mg exerts an equal and opposite force on the Earth of Mg = Mea (where a is a very small acceleration of the Earth toward the centre of mass of the earth/M system). The work done by the block on the Earth would be Mgd where d is the distance the Earth moves toward the centre of mass - an extremely small distance. So, in the frame of reference of the earth/M centre of mass, the work done by the block on the Earth is insignificant compared to the work done by the Earth on the block.

In the case where you apply the upward force F to the block, you have to define a frame of reference. Are you asking whether there is work done to you in the frame of reference of the earth?

AM
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top