Uniform circular motion; radial and lateral components?

AI Thread Summary
In uniform circular motion, the tension in the string and the weight of the rock are the only forces acting on the rock, with the centripetal force being a component of the tension. The angle the string makes with the ceiling influences the radius of the circular path and the speed of the rock. The vertical component of the tension balances the weight of the rock, while the horizontal component provides the necessary centripetal force for circular motion. Understanding these relationships is crucial for calculating the speed of the rock based on the angle of the string. Overall, the centripetal force is not a distinct force but rather a result of the tension's components.
Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm trying to understand circular motion more intimately. Let's say I have a 1.8 m long piece of twine that I attach to my ceiling and attach a rock with a mass of 650 g from the hanging end. Let's say (with my superhuman coordination) I manage to get the rock spinning in a perfectly horizontal circle (IE it doesn't move up or down in the z-axis at all) at a constant speed. If I know the angle the twine makes with the ceiling, is there a way to calculate the speed the rock is going around the circle at?

Here are my initial thoughts. Once the motion has started and the rock is in its perfect circle at its constant velocity, let's say it makes a constant angle theta with the ceiling. Doing a little trig, the radius of the circle the rock is traveling in would be equal to 1.8sin(180 - theta) m. If we ignore drag and other neg. forces, then three forces are acting on the rock: gravity, tension, and a centripetal force. It is at this point that my whole body starts shaking and I generally pass out.

In this ideal situation, the angle the string makes with the ceiling would be a function of the velocity the rock is traveling around the circle in and therefore the velocity the rock is traveling around the circle in would be a function of the angle. I have come up with two formulas for the rock's velocity, but in both mass disappears so they obviously can't be right.

I would appreciate any help - or at least perhaps a site covering uniform circular motion a bit better than the two pages my textbook gives it. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Signifier said:
then three forces are acting on the rock: gravity, tension, and a centripetal force. It is at this point that my whole body starts shaking and I generally pass out.

Actually only two forces are acting on the rock, the tension from the string and the weight of the rock. The centripital force on the rock comes from a component of the tension in the string and is not a separate force from it.
 
That is interesting... could you explain what you mean by the centripetal force coming from a "component of the tension in the string"?
 
Well centripital force isn't a new kind of force, it has to come from something, I'm not sure how to word this so this probably isn't exactly what I mean or want to say, but I hope you get what I mean. The tension holding the ball in a circle is at an angle right? Yes, so there are two components to it one horizontal and one vertical, assuming the ball is in equilibrium in the vertical direction the upward tension has to be equal to its weight, but we know that the ball is in uniform circular motion in the horizontal direction, well that circular motion has to be caused by some force since the velocity of the rock is changing it must be accelerating.

Ok to depart from that for just a second, the two requirements for a force to be centripital are that it is perpendicular to the velocity vector and towards the center of motion. Now since the horizontal tension in the strings fits these criteria it is a centripital force that acts on the ball.

The key thing is that the centripital force on teh ball is not a separate thing from the tension in the string, just a component of it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top