Uniform pdf from difference of two stochastic variables?

bemortu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to find a probability distribution (D) with the following property:
Given two independent stochastic variables X1 and X2 from the distribution D, I want the difference Y=X1-X2 to have a uniform distribution (one the interval [0,1], say).

I don't seem to be able to solve it. I'm not even sure that such a distribution exists...

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sugestion (outline). For simplicity I will make it uniform on the interval (-1/2,1/2). The characteristic function is sin(t/2)/(t/2). Take the square root and then the inverse Fourier transform should give you something close to what you want (the sum of two random variables will have a uniform distribution).
 
Yes, that's one of the things I already tried. The problem is that I didn't manage to calculate that inverse Fourier transform. I tried it with Mathematica, which could not find an analytical solution. I also tried the numerical inverse Fourier transform in Mathematica but it also failed. Maybe it means that this distribution doesn't exist?
 
My guess: there is no density function. You might try getting the distribution function.

F(y) - F(x) = 1/2π ∫{(exp(ity) - exp(itx))φ(t)/(it)}dt
------------------------------------------------------------------

http://mathforum.org/kb/forumcategory.jspa?categoryID=16

You might try the above forum - it is more mathematical.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top