Uniformity of universe expansion

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
As far as I understand, the justifications for the uniformity of the expansion of the visible universe comes from the CMBR and from the uniformity of the red shift around us. However, I was wondering whether theoretically one could make an interferometer sensitive enough to measure this: the sensitivity of the Michelson Morley interferometer was enough to measure differences of the speed of light with respect to the vacuum, but it would need greater sensitivity to see whether, assuming this result, the expansion of space would make a difference in different directions. Is this an unrealizable thought experiment, or is the thought experiment itself faulty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, clearly, assuming such a non-uniformity exists, it would require more sensitivity than our current instruments have to measure it since otherwise it would have already been observed. How much more sensitivity would, presumably, depend on the extent of the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
Thanks, phinds. In other words, the thought experiment is valid, but as many thought experiments, it is unknown whether it would eventually give a result.
 
nomadreid said:
Thanks, phinds. In other words, the thought experiment is valid, but as many thought experiments, it is unknown whether it would eventually give a result.
True, but it is very unlikely to give any results (other than just continuing support for the Cosmological Principle).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top