Uniformly Accelerated Linear Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to uniformly accelerated linear motion involving a teenager's car trip. Key calculations include determining the total time taken for the trip, which amounts to 38.67 seconds, and the total distance traveled, calculated to be 507.4 meters. Participants noted the importance of considering the momentary stops and the deceleration phases in the calculations. Additionally, there was a discussion on how to properly format mathematical expressions using LaTeX in the forum. The final consensus highlighted the necessity of including all phases of motion to arrive at accurate results.
Tentothe
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Uniformly Accelerated Linear Motion

Hello,

I am attempting what looks to be a fairly easy problem involving uniform acceleration and linear motion, but my answers just aren't coming out right and I'm unable to see where I'm going wrong. Any help is appreciated.

Homework Statement



A teenager has a car that accelerates at 3.00 m/s^{2} and decelerates at -4.50 m/s^{2}. On a trip to the store, he accelerates from rest to 15.0 m/s, drives at a constant speed for 6.00 s, and then comes to a momentary stop at the corner. He then accelerates to 18.0 m/s, drives at a constant speed for 15.0 s, and decelerates for 2.67 s. Then he continues for 4.00 s at this speed and comes to a stop.

(a) How long does the trip take?
(b) How far has he traveled?


Homework Equations



(i) \DeltaX = \frac{v^{2}_{f} - v^{2}_{i}}{2a}

(ii) \DeltaX = v_{i}t + \frac{1}{2}at^{2}

(iii) v = v_{i} + at


The Attempt at a Solution



I've broken the problem down into the 6 parts of the trip and calculated both the time and distance over each and then added them up for the total.

(a) Calculating time taken

Part I: Accelerates from rest to 15.0 m/s, so:
v_{i} = 0 m/s, v_{f} = 15.0 m/s, a = 3.00 m/s^{2}​

Solving equation (iii) for t and plugging in values gives:
t = (15.0 - 0)/3.00 = 5.00 s.​

Part II: Constant speed for 6.00 s, so no calculation needed; t = 6.00 s.

Part III: After momentary stop, accelerates from rest to 18.0 m/s, so same as part I.
v_{i} = 0 m/s, v_{f} = 18.0 m/s, a = 3.00 m/s^{2}​
t = (18.0 - 0)/3.00 = 6.00 s.​

Part IV: Constant speed for 15.0 s, so again no calculation needed; t = 15.0 s.

Part V: Decelerates for 2.67 s; time given, no calculation needed; t = 2.67 s.

Part VI: Constant speed for 4.00 s, no calculation needed; t = 4.00 s.

Adding up time taken for all parts: 5.00 s + 6.00 s + 6.00 s + 15.0 s + 2.67 s + 4.00 s = 38.67 s.

(b) Calculating distance traveled

Part I: Using equation (i) with x_{i} = 0, v_{f} = 15.0 m/s, v_{i} = 0 m/s, a = 3.00 m/s_{2},
X = (15.0)^{2}/2(3.00) = 37.5 m​

Part II: Constant speed of 15.0 m/s for 6.00 s, so X = 15.0 * 6.00 = 90.0 m.

Part III: Same as part I after stop, so using equation (i) with x_{i} = 0, v_{f} = 18.0 m/s, v_{i} = 0 m/s, a = 3.00 m/s^{2},
X = (18.0)^{2}/2(3.00) = 54.0 m​

Part IV: Constant speed of 18.0 m/s for 15.0 s, so X = 18.0 * 15.0 = 270 m.

Part V: Decelerates for 2.67 s, so using equation (ii) with v_{i} = 18.0 m/s, t = 2.67 s, a = -4.50 m/s^{2},
X = (18.0)(2.67) + (0.5)(-4.50)(2.67)^{2} = 32.0 m​

Part VI: Constant speed for 4.00 s, so first need to find v_{f} after deceleration in part V by using equation (iii) with v^{i} = 18.0 m/s, a = -4.50 m/s^{2}, and t = 2.67 s.
v = (18.0) + (-4.50)(2.67) = 5.99 m/s​

Travels at constant speed of 5.99 m/s for 4.00 s, so 5.99 * 4.00 = 23.9 m.

Adding up all of the distances gives total: 37.5 m + 90.0 m + 54.0 m + 270 m + 32.0 m + 23.9 m = 507.4 m.

I must be missing something that's glaringly obvious here. I thought perhaps the undefined "momentary stop" might be skewing my results for part (a), but more likely I've overlooked something. Thanks in advance to whoever can point out where I've gone wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
and then comes to a momentary stop at the corner.

I wonder how he managed to come to that momentary stop, without decelerating ?
 
>>Then he continues for 4.00 s at this speed and comes to a stop.

I think there will be a Part VII for calculating the distance traveled while decelerating.

x=(0^2-5.99^2)/(2*(-4.50))How do you type the square ? I don't know how to get that square so i use ^
 
Google_Spider said:
I think there will be a Part VII for calculating the distance traveled while decelerating.

Thanks. I knew I was excluding something. I just factored in those 2 stops and got the answer.

How do you type the square ? I don't know how to get that square so i use ^

I used the Latex code this forum has. There is a reference for all of the codes on the post message page. You can click on the sigma icon and then "Subscript and Superscript," then the picture showing a superscript and type a '2' between the brackets. The code is something like x[ tex]^{2}[ /tex] without the spaces to get x^{2}. A lot faster to just type ^ though.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top