Unifying Numerical Math and Symbolic Logic: Has Progress Been Made?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alvin51015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic Numerical
AI Thread Summary
Progress in unifying numerical mathematics with symbolic logic has faced significant challenges, particularly highlighted by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, which indicate that no axiomatic system can prove all truths. Attempts to reduce mathematics to a purely logical framework have largely been deemed impossible, as there will always be propositions that remain unprovable. Recent developments in logic have shifted focus towards multi-valued and fuzzy logics, which allow for degrees of truth rather than a binary true-false dichotomy. The discussion also touches on the construction of real numbers from set theory, suggesting a complex relationship between these fields. Overall, while there have been advancements in logic, a complete unification remains elusive.
alvin51015
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
In the late 1980's I asked my logic professor if there was some kind of logical and/or mathematical process which unified numerically based mathematics with true-false based symbolic logic.He told me that someone had written a lengthy book which apparently proved that it was totally impossible to do such a thing.But I keep thinking that there must be a way.So my question is whether any progress had been made in this area in the last twenty plus years.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I really have no clear idea what you mean by "unified numerically based mathematics with true-false based symbolic logic". There were, in the late 19th century, attempts to reduce all forms of mathematics to an "axiom based" form of logic but Curt Goedel, in the early twentieth century showed that such a thing was impossible: given any set of axioms, there exist a statement that can neither be proved nor disproved from those axioms.

Indeed, rather than "true-false based symbolic logic", much of the recent work in logic has been the other way- "multi-valued logics" and "fuzzy logic" where statement are NOT just "true or false" but may have varying degrees of "trueness".
 
given any set of axioms, there exist a statement that can neither be proved nor disproved from those axioms.

Any set of axioms powerful enough to do arithmetic. Proposition logic is an exception, for example.

The numerically-based math reduced to symbolic logic sounds kind of like the construction of the real numbers and all that from set theory. It's not really reduced to symbolic logic, but it's reduced to sets.

As far as recent developments go, this came to mind:

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/10/01/voevodskys-mathematical-revolution/
 
homeomorphic said:
Any set of axioms powerful enough to do arithmetic. Proposition logic is an exception, for example.
Yes, I should have said that.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top