Bipolarity
- 773
- 2
Let's say we have a point-normal representation of a space:
n \cdot P_{0}P = 0 where n is a vector <a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}> and P_{0} is a point through which the space passes and P is the set of all points contained in the space.
In ℝ^{2}, the point-normal representation defines a line.
In ℝ^{3}, the point-normal representation defines a plane.
In ℝ^{n}, the point-normal representation defines a hyperplane, or (n-1) dimensional affine space.
It can be shown that this affine space can be represented in component form as:
a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b
where b is a constant.
My question is essentially asking about the converse of the representation done above: Can we go from the component-wise representation to the point-normal representation?
In other words, can we show that the only vectors normal to the space determined by a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b are vectors of the form
t<a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}> where t is a scalar parameter?
BiP
n \cdot P_{0}P = 0 where n is a vector <a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}> and P_{0} is a point through which the space passes and P is the set of all points contained in the space.
In ℝ^{2}, the point-normal representation defines a line.
In ℝ^{3}, the point-normal representation defines a plane.
In ℝ^{n}, the point-normal representation defines a hyperplane, or (n-1) dimensional affine space.
It can be shown that this affine space can be represented in component form as:
a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b
where b is a constant.
My question is essentially asking about the converse of the representation done above: Can we go from the component-wise representation to the point-normal representation?
In other words, can we show that the only vectors normal to the space determined by a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b are vectors of the form
t<a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}> where t is a scalar parameter?
BiP