Unique set of vectors normal to a hyperplane

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Let's say we have a point-normal representation of a space:
n \cdot P_{0}P = 0 where n is a vector <a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}> and P_{0} is a point through which the space passes and P is the set of all points contained in the space.

In ℝ^{2}, the point-normal representation defines a line.
In ℝ^{3}, the point-normal representation defines a plane.
In ℝ^{n}, the point-normal representation defines a hyperplane, or (n-1) dimensional affine space.

It can be shown that this affine space can be represented in component form as:
a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b
where b is a constant.

My question is essentially asking about the converse of the representation done above: Can we go from the component-wise representation to the point-normal representation?
In other words, can we show that the only vectors normal to the space determined by a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b are vectors of the form
t<a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}> where t is a scalar parameter?

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Bipolarity.

You could use the identity that <tx,y> = t<x,y> for general inner products and if <x,y> = 0 then <tx,y> = t<x,y> = 0 for all x and y in the inner product space.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top