Why Is the Unit Normal Vector N(s) Defined as r''(s)/||r''(s)||?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 13K views
issisoccer10
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question comes from my multivariable differential calculus course, and it pertains to arc length parametrizations the unit normal vector of a curve.

Why does the arc length parametrization of the unit normal vector of a curve, N(s) equal...

_r''(s)__ = N(s) and not just equivalent to r''(s) = N(s)?
||r''(s)||

Homework Equations


T(s) = r'(s)
||r'(s)|| = 1



The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that since ||r'(s)|| = 1, ||r''(s)|| would be equivalent to 1 as well since they are both the normalizations of arc length parametrizations of curves. However, this apparently isn't the case...any help would be appreciated

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm just seconding Dick. If a curve is paraemtrised by arclength [itex]\vec{r}(s)[/itex], then it follows from the definition of "arclength", and the chain rule, that the length of [itex]\vec{r}'[/itex] is 1. There is no reason to expect that to be true for [itex]\vec{r}''[/itex] as well.

Of course, [itex]\vec{r}''[/itex] is normal to the curve. I just doesn't have length 1.