Unit Vector Confusion: Understanding Direction & Scalar Product Formula

AI Thread Summary
Unit vectors represent direction by having a length of one, effectively decoupling direction from magnitude. The scalar product formula, a.b = |a| |b| cos(θ), relates to unit vectors by showing that the cosine of the angle between two vectors can be derived from their unit forms. This means that both a vector and its unit vector indicate the same direction, but the unit vector simplifies analysis by removing length as a variable. Understanding this distinction helps clarify how unit vectors function in vector mathematics. Overall, unit vectors are essential for focusing on direction without the complexity of magnitude.
Rudders
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a little confusion with vectors. I have memorised the formula so I can apply it, but I don't feel I really understand how it works.

One thing that confuses me is this. How does a unit vector exactly show direction. I've memorized and can blindly believe that this is how it is, but I was wondering if someone could show how it does this, then this'll hopefully enable me to understand and apply them better.

Also, if possible. I was wondering how the scalar product formula works (I think this has to do with the unit vector, but I'm not too sure).

The formula is: a.b = |a| |b| cos (theta)

Which finds the angle between two vectors... but I'm not sure how :(

Thanks heaps!
-Rudders
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Direction.html :
"The direction from an object A to another object B can be specified as a vector v = AB with tail at A and head at B. However, since this vector has length equal to the distance between the objects in addition to encoding the direction from the first to the second, it is natural to instead consider the unit vector v (sometimes called the direction vector), which decouples the distance from the direction."

Simply put: X.Y = |X| |Y| cos θ implies (X/|X|).(Y/|Y|) = cos θ. (Each of X/|X| and Y/|Y| is a unit vector.)

This also explains how the angle θ relates to unit vectors.
 
Last edited:
Hi Rudders! :smile:
Rudders said:
… I have memorised the formula so I can apply it, but I don't feel I really understand how it works.

Which formula are you talking about? :confused:
 
I think he means \frac{\vec u}{|u|}.

A unit vector is as the name tells a vector of unit length, i.e. its length is 1. As you can see by the Pythagorean theorem, there are many right triangles with a hypotenuse of length 1, and all of these can be seen as unit vectors where the length of the two other sides represent the x and y coordinates. Try this, draw a coordinate system on a paper, draw a vector arrow in some direction starting from the origin. Observe that you can shrink the arrow in length by moving it closer of away from the origin, where each length corresponds to x and y coordinates. This process is the geometric way of multiplying the vector with a number \lambda, and if this \lambda happens to be 1/|u|, I think you will see that this is analgous to multiplying a number a by 1/a, which gives 1.
 
Every vector has "length" and "direction". Multiplying or dividing a vector by a number changes the length but not the direction.

The confusion may be that you are thinking that the unit vector \frac{\vec{u}}{|\vec{u}|} shows direction in some way that \vec{u} itself doesn't. That is not true- they both show the same direction.

We prefer to use unit vectors to "show direction" in that they do not have "distracting" other information- length.
 
Hmm. Think I understand now. Thanks :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top