I What Unit Results from Dividing Joules per Kilogram by Meters?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy Schablin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unit
AI Thread Summary
Dividing 1 Joule per kilogram by 0.5 meters results in a calculation for gravitational acceleration. The discussion explores whether the resulting unit is N/kg and clarifies that a Newton can be expressed in terms of kg, m, and s. The calculation indicates that gravity on the hypothetical planet is 2 m/s². However, there is confusion about expressing this result in N/kg, as the participants debate the correct unit representation. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding the relationship between energy, mass, and gravitational force.
Timothy Schablin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What unit would i end up with if i divide 1 Joules/kg by .5 meters?

Would it be N/kg?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is a Newton in terms of kg, m and s?
 
ya. N/kg doesn't sound right. Its for finding the gravity on planet X. If the object has 1 J/kg of gravitational potential at .5 meters from the surface, what is the gravity on that planet?

So Vg = gy so g = V/y. So, 1/.5 = 2

The gravity on that planet is 2 m/s? But they want the answer in N/kg, but that doesn't sound right.
 
Re-arrange f=ma and what units do you get that equal N/kg?
 
Let me ask again. What is a Newton in terms of kg, m and s?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top