Why Normalization Factors in Fourier Transform Pairs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
hello forum,
a question about normalization factors in the Fourier transform pairs:

why is it that a factor 1/2*pi in only one, or 1/sqrt(2pi) in both, or no factor (in the case the complex basis functions have argument 2*pi*f) need to be in front of the Fourier transform pair?

I understand normalization and its importance in the dot product calculation of coefficients.
Sines, cosines, and complex exponentials have normalization factors equal to 1/sqrt(pi)...
in order to get modulus one...


thanks
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it is there for normalization as you said, and there exists several conventions which works.
 
so,

exp (i*w*t) and exp (i*2*pi*f*t) don't have the same normalization factors? Why?
 
since you have 2pi already in the exponential
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top