Is there a universal math database for precise definitions and theorems?

AI Thread Summary
A universal math database with precise definitions and theorems does not exist, as terminology can vary between authors. While the meanings of theorems and definitions are generally consistent, the wording can differ significantly. It is recommended to consult multiple sources to find the phrasing that resonates best with individual understanding. Despite variations, most printed versions convey the same underlying concepts. Ultimately, familiarity with different expressions can enhance comprehension in mathematics.
Noxide
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Does there exist a database with very specific mathematical definitions, theorems... etc? I've found that some thm's/dfn etc differ from author to author. Not necessarily in meaning, but in the words used to describe them. Is there a place where a precise definition can be found that is agreed upon by all mathematicians?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are no universally agreed ways to word specific theorems or definitions. However, discounting typos (and occasionally wikipedia!) you can be pretty certain that any two wordings of the same theorem/definition in print mean essentially the same thing. I suggest trying different sources until you find one that you are most comfortable with, and then referring to that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top