Universe AgeSize with respect to DM?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spin_Network
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the age and size of the universe and its dark matter content. While dark matter constitutes about 23% of the critical density, its contribution to the universe's flatness has changed over time, particularly before and after the "lambda transition" when dark energy became dominant. The relative contributions of dark matter and dark energy significantly influence the universe's size and expansion rate, but baryonic matter's contribution does not affect these factors. There is uncertainty regarding the consistency of dark matter ratios since the Big Bang, and its form may have evolved significantly since then. Overall, understanding dark matter's role is crucial for comprehending the universe's evolution.
Spin_Network
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
What are the prospects of Aging the Universe with respect to the Dark Matter Content of our perceived Universe?..and can we gauge the size of the Universe with respect to the percentage of Dark Matter?..ie..DM amounts to about 95%,,does this have a baring on the Universe age and size?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The total mass in dark matter should not change with time, but its density relative to the critical density will. In other words, its relative contribution to the flatness of the universe changes with time. Before the "lambda transition" where the dark energy became the dominant contribution to the flatness, dark matter's contribution had been increasing with time. Now, we think that its contribution is decreasing.

I'm not sure where your "95%" number came from. The current percentage of the critical density that's dark matter is about 23%.

Oh, and yes, the relative contributions of dark matter and dark energy do make a difference for the size and expansion rate of the universe. The relative contributions of baryonic and dark matter to the total matter budget don't impact the expansion rate or size, however.
 
SpaceTiger said:
The total mass in dark matter should not change with time, but its density relative to the critical density will. In other words, its relative contribution to the flatness of the universe changes with time. Before the "lambda transition" where the dark energy became the dominant contribution to the flatness, dark matter's contribution had been increasing with time. Now, we think that its contribution is decreasing.

I'm not sure where your "95%" number came from. The current percentage of the critical density that's dark matter is about 23%.

Oh, and yes, the relative contributions of dark matter and dark energy do make a difference for the size and expansion rate of the universe. The relative contributions of baryonic and dark matter to the total matter budget don't impact the expansion rate or size, however.

I see, can you point me to a source that explains the Big-Bang evolved from a Proton Sized entity..and is this Proton sized 'object', Dark Matter free?

A simpler question is:Was the Dark Matter 'percentage' always the same ratio( 75% *) at the Big-Bang?..and would there be a small 'fraction' still evident within ..say a Proton today?

Thanks for the correction, I was incorrect in my original ratio.
 
Spin_Network said:
I see, can you point me to a source that explains the Big-Bang evolved from a Proton Sized entity..and is this Proton sized 'object', Dark Matter free?

I don't think we have a strong enough grasp of physics to confidently extrapolate that far back (if it even goes that far), but whatever the dark matter is, it would be in an entirely different form at that point.


A simpler question is:Was the Dark Matter 'percentage' always the same ratio( 75% *) at the Big-Bang?

The ratio of non-baryonic matter to baryonic matter has been the same for most of the history of the universe. Whether it has always been the same is an issue for particle physicists to address (i.e. whether baryon number is always conserved). Dark matter, however, can include some baryonic matter (like planets). Thus, the ratio of dark matter to luminous matter will change with time.


..and would there be a small 'fraction' still evident within ..say a Proton today?

I'm not sure what you mean by that.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top