Schools University vs Departmental Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter some_dude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power University
AI Thread Summary
Graduate school admissions processes typically see departments wielding more influence than the central university admissions offices, which often act as a rubber stamp for departmental recommendations. While departments may set higher admission standards, the registrar's office primarily enforces minimum requirements established by the university. Instances where a department wishes to admit a candidate who does not meet these minimums are uncommon but can complicate the process. Overall, once a department approves a candidate for admission, the registrar's role is largely procedural, confirming acceptance and funding.
some_dude
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does anyone know how much power general university grad school admissions offices tend to have versus the departmental ones? At one school I'm applying to, the departments make recommendations to the registrar's office, which actually sends out the formal acceptances. I just found out I recommended for acceptence with full funding at one school by the math department. Now it's in the registrar's hands, and I really hope it's just a rubber stamp type process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
some_dude said:
Does anyone know how much power general university grad school admissions offices tend to have versus the departmental ones?

For graduate admissions, the central university administration is usually a rubber stamp.
 
At all the schools I'm familiar with it's more or less a rubber stamp process. The university registrar will establish minimum requirements for graduate student admissions into the university. Often specific departments will have higher minimum admission requirements or at very least adopt the same ones.

The only tricky situation I can think of is if for whatever reason the department wants to admit you but you don't meet the university's minimum admission requirements. This is a pretty rare circumstance though.
 
My acceptance to grad school was essentially handled by the department, and I had little interaction with the registrar's office. The registrar's involvement seemed more or less a formality.
 
Choppy said:
The only tricky situation I can think of is if for whatever reason the department wants to admit you but you don't meet the university's minimum admission requirements. This is a pretty rare circumstance though.
Was kind of in this situation (missed the departments GRE requirement by a drop), and I still got my letter 'cause the department had approved it.
 
Choppy said:
The only tricky situation I can think of is if for whatever reason the department wants to admit you but you don't meet the university's minimum admission requirements. This is a pretty rare circumstance though.

Sigh, I'm in this circumstance...
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top