Unlimited Space Travel: Solving the Relativity Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldilocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a proper time T on a spaceship traveling distance D from Earth, its speed must exceed a specific threshold defined by the equation v > c/((1+((c^2*T^2)/D^2))^0.5). This indicates that, theoretically, relativity does not limit the distance an astronaut can travel within their lifetime if the ship can approach the speed of light (c). The discussion also seeks to determine how far the ship travels in time T from the Earth’s perspective and how time dilation affects the passage of time on the ship compared to Earth. These calculations are essential to understanding the implications of relativistic travel. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the potential for unlimited space travel under the right conditions.
goldilocks
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I would very much appreciate some help getting started with the following problem. As I don't really know where to begin:

Show that for a space-ship to travel a distance, D, from Earth so that its “on-board” proper time elapses by, at most, T, the ship’s speed (relative to Earth) must be such that:

v > c/((1+((c^2*T^2)/D^2))^0.5)

Hence argue, in principle, that relativity imposes no limit to the distance that an astronaut can aspire to travel during his (finite) lifetime, provided his spaceship can reach speeds sufficiently close to c


Thank you very much! xxx :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Can you answer the following two questions:

(1) If the ship is traveling at velocity v in the Earth frame, how far will it travel in time T in the Earth frame?

(2) If the ship is traveling at velocity v in the Earth frame, how much slower does time pass in the ship's frame than the Earth frame?

If you can write down these two expressions, it should be simple to put them together to come up with the answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top