Unlocking 4096 Colors: What Are the Secrets of String Coding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coding Strings
Physics news on Phys.org
arivero said:
4096 colours?
in the bosonic case and in the superstring 10D case it is 16 colours.

Here at PF we have 26 smilies. one for each parameter in the standard model:rolleyes: :smile: :approve: :cry:

:frown: :bugeye: :eek: :rolleyes: :shy:

:!) :mad: :wink: o:)

:-p :devil: :biggrin: :blushing:

:cool: :redface: :smile: :-p :confused:

:zzz:
 
Last edited:
Hi arivero,

Your slow post [not Haloscan] to the Reference Frame thread above with Lubos' response brings sequences to my perspective.

Were an 8 to accompany the 5, 13 then Fibonacci numbers come to my mind.
 
Dcase said:
Hi arivero,

Your slow post [not Haloscan] to the Reference Frame thread above with Lubos' response brings sequences to my perspective.

Were an 8 to accompany the 5, 13 then Fibonacci numbers come to my mind.

I would bet for a 9. The point is that 10-dimensional and 26 dimensional strings have the same signature module 8. The signature is number of spatial dimensions minus number of time dimensions, so 9-1=8 or 25-1=24. The 25-1=24 is the origin of the work of Borcherds you mentioned in other thread.

In the middle we have 17-1=16, so 18 dimensions and then some unknown object with a group SO(2^9).

But speaking of sequences, I found the one of hexagonal numbers, hidden in my https://www.physicsforums.com/blogs/arivero-81/generations-1008/ post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top