Unraveling the Mysteries of Black Holes: Finite or Infinite Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether black holes possess finite or infinite mass, concluding that they have finite mass, which aligns with gravitational principles. The mass of a black hole is generally equivalent to that of the star from which it formed, typically requiring a mass greater than 30 times that of the Sun. Black holes can lose mass through Hawking radiation, a process where particle-antiparticle pairs at the event horizon result in energy loss, although the rate of this loss is extremely slow. The energy of a black hole is described by E=mc^2, and estimates suggest it could take around 10^66 years for a black hole the size of the Sun to evaporate completely. The dimensionality of black holes remains uncertain, with theories suggesting they may exist in more than the four dimensions we experience.
Ryosuke
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Here's another one of my stupid ideas :-p


First question, do black holes have a finite mass or an infinite mass?

If they have a finite mass, disreguard everything i write below.


Now if they have infinite mass, the gravitational formula is:

Gravitational force = (G * m1 * m2) / (d2)

so, blah blah blah, it would mean the gravitational force of the black hole was infinite too, which couldn't be true, could it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass of a black hole is finite.
 
ah, well that answers that

should teach me to pay more attention
 
Is there any way of knowing the mass?? I thing I read somewhere (I may be wrong) that the mass (and gravity) of a black hole is roughly equal to that of the star before it turned into a black hole. Is this correct?
 
In order for a star to turn into a black hole, its mass must exceed some value (which I don't know).
To go out on a limb here (I don't know much about this, either), the basic dynamics for the formation of a black hole is that through burn-off of its matter, the star reaches a point where it cannot generate the necessary pressure to prevent the collapse of its form into a black hole.
(The gravitational force on an element of the star is directed inwards to the center, hence all elements would speed inwards to the center unless a sufficient pressure kept them from doing so..).
 
Well its about greater than 30 times the mass of the Sun that a black hole forms. A black hole is formed when matter achieves a density such that the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light. We can only know exactly 3 quantities of a black hole namely the mass, charge and angular momentum...all other information of what made it up is lost (related to entropy...but that's a whole other long and complex story!)
As for the mass query it is NOT constant...Hawking found that black holes can lose energy, by particles escaping. Particle-antiparticle pairs can be formed at the event horizon by energy from the gravitational field, if one of the pair falls into the black hole the other continues until infinity, i.e carrying energy away from the black hole-this is known as Hawking Radiation.
Hope this helps

Ray
 
rayveldkamp:
Do we have, as yet, any estimate of the rate of energy loss of the black hole due to Hawking radiation other than that it is probably non-zero?
 
The answer is not exactly, but we can make a very good approximation. We currently have no quantum theory of gravity, but we do for the other fundamental interactions, so to explain black holes we use the quantum theories of these three, but use Einstein's General Relativity (a CLASSICAL theory) to account for gravity...this is OK because the quantum gravity effects only take place on very very small scales, namely the Planck length 10^-35m

At any instant the energy of the black hole is given by E=mc^2. A rather crude approximation is to equate the derivative of this to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and after a little integration we get the result that for a black hole the same mass as our Sun it would take 10^66 years to completely evapourate.
So the answer to your question is a VERY small rate of energy loss, however the amazing result is that there is an "evapouration" of black holes.
 
but if light has an escape velocity, wouln't that mean that it also has mass?, for example you have to be going faster than 9.8 to escape earth, and the more massive the object, the more energy you need to reach this.
 
  • #10
No, in the quantum model light consists of photons which are massless particles, but do exhibit wave-like phenomena (eg light diffraction, reflection etc), nonetheless light is particle in nature. Photons, although having no mass, do have a momentum, this is why light has an escape velocity.
Since the photon is massless it must travel at the speed of light c, and hence it is a relativistic particle and cannot be treated with the usual methods. The energy is given by:
E^2=p^2 c^2 +m^2c^4 where p is its momentum and c is its REST MASS.
Hence for a photon (or any massless particle) E=pc

Hope this helps
Ray
 
  • #11
is black hole 3 dimensional ?
 
  • #12
ahhh its hard to say, on the basis of our everyday space-time we would say it is 4 dimensional (3 space + 1 time), however many theories, for example some superstrings and M-theory predict the universe consists of many more dimensions than just 4. So the answer is simple...we don't know!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Back
Top