Unraveling the Mystery: The Quest to Understand Magnetic Monopoles

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic monopoles remain a theoretical concept, with no definitive evidence of their existence in nature. If they do exist, their magnetic charge would be significantly smaller than electric charge, as supported by precise tests of Maxwell's equations. Some studies have suggested the presence of Dirac monopoles, particularly in materials like spin ice, but these claims have not been universally accepted. The discussion also touches on the duality transformation in Maxwell's equations, which allows for a blending of electric and magnetic charges, raising questions about the fundamental nature of these forces. Ultimately, the existence of magnetic monopoles remains an open question in physics, inviting both scientific and philosophical inquiry.
NEILS BOHR
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
magnetic monopoles??

why don't magnetic monopoles exist??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Actually the question can be set in a different way? Do the magnetic monopoles exist?
The last question still do not have answer. The magnetic monoples may or may not exist. If they exist then the magnetic charge should be much, much less then a electric charge due to the fact that the Maxwell equations are tested to high precision and therefore only a very small magnetic charge can exist.
From time to time there are publications that claimed the demonstration of the Dirac monopoles (such as spin ice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_ice) but the real monopoles are not found in Nature yet…..
 


The question is even actually slightly more interesting then that. There is what is called a duality transformation for Maxwells equations which can transform E and B into E' and B', and electric charge and current into a mixture of electric charge, current, and also magnetic charges and currents. That is, for example, an electron would be partially an electric monopole and partially a magnetic monopole in the new fields instead of pure electric monopole. It would also then be partially magnetic dipole and electric dipole instead of pure magnetic dipole. So what is important is if the *ratio* of magnetic charge/current to electric charge/current is the same everywhere. If so, then one can conveniently transform away one or the other. Historically, the fields are chosen such that magnetic charge/current = zero.

Duality transformation from Jackson p. 274
\vec{E} = \vec{E}'cos(\theta) + Z_0\vec{H}'sin(\theta)
Z_0\vec{H} = -\vec{E}'sin(\theta) + Z_0\vec{H}'cos(\theta)

Z_0\vec{D} = Z_0\vec{D}'cos(\theta) + \vec{B}'sin(\theta)
\vec{B} = -Z_0\vec{D}'sin(\theta) + \vec{B}'cos(\theta)

Z_0\rho_e = Z_0\rho_e'cos(\theta) + \rho_m'sin(\theta)
\rho_m = -Z_0\rho_e'sin(\theta) + \rho_m'cos(\theta)

Z_0\vec{J_e} = Z_0\vec{J_e}'cos(\theta) + \vec{J_m}'sin(\theta)
\vec{J_m} = -Z_0\vec{J_e}'sin(\theta) + \vec{J_m}'cos(\theta)

Z_0 = \sqrt{\mu_0/\epsilon_0}

Subscripts e or m indicate electric and magnetic sources respectively.

It can be fun to play around with these to come up with different configurations.
 
Last edited:


your question is more philosophical in nature...in science there is a caution in handling a question of "why"...you can't ask "why" questions always...
well y arent they any monopoles.? - god noes !... its like asking y do Newton's laws wroks? or ts like y is force equals m times acceleration... well its good that you started 'thinking' the science way, but do think upon why your question of "why" dosent survive . ah ! dats a pun der ! ;)... check out this on my blog if u have time http://intellectual-discomfort.blogspot.com/2011/01/science-is-questioning-but-wait-what-to.html
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top