Unravelling Surface Area of a Dome

AI Thread Summary
The formula for the surface area of a dome is proposed as 2πrh, where h represents the height of the dome above its slice through the sphere. The discussion seeks to understand how the surface area changes when the slice through the sphere is adjusted, particularly when moving from the center to a position at 1/2 r. It questions whether the area halves, quarters, or changes in another way as the slice moves. Participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the geometry involved, including the relationships between the sphere and the paraboloid. Clear communication and proper presentation of questions are also highlighted as essential for effective assistance.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,896
Reaction score
7,939
Trying to figure out the answer to another thread.

What is formula for the surface area of a dome?

Googling got me 2\pi r h (where h is the height of the dome above its slice through the sphere). Is that right?

Ultimately, I'm trying to figure out how the area changes as a function of the slice through the sphere. i.e.:

When the slice goes through the centre of the sphere, the area is X (in fact, exactly half of the sphere's area).

OK. Now, if I move the slice out to 1/2 r, what does that do to the area of the dome? Does the area halve? or quarter?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I advise u draw a picture.Explain the geometry of the drawing.Which is the sphere,which is the paraboloid,is it a revolution paraboloid,are they coaxial,what is "h",what is "r",or simply give the link to the webpage where u got that result.

If you're asking for help,at least do it in a proper way.

Daniel.
 
Guess I didn't get the memo on "the proper way".


(Don't know why this gpt posted twice...)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top