Unravelling the History of Stars: 14 Billion Years

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewmans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars Stellar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the origins of elements in our bodies and Earth, tracing them back to supernovae and novae over the past 14 billion years. It suggests that most heavy elements, including iron, likely originated from massive stars, with supernovae being the primary source. Stellar spectroscopy indicates that many stars with similar chemical compositions to the Sun exist nearby, though they may not share a common origin. The frequency of supernovae was significantly higher in the early galaxy, as evidenced by the spectra of distant galaxies. Overall, the formation of our solar system involved a complex mix of materials from numerous deceased stars.
thenewmans
Messages
168
Reaction score
1
I have a series of questions here all around me attempting to get a better image of what has happened around here over the last 14 billion years. You don’t have to answer them individually. One good explanation might answer them all.

Q1: About how many novas, supernovas and such have the matter in our bodies or in Earth gone through? I assume there’s an estimate based on the proportion of elements or something like that.

Q2: How big were the stars from which we are made? I assume we use to be in some pretty big stars since we have iron. Maybe the first one was really big.

Q3: Did our iron come from one nova and our oxygen come from another? Maybe our stellar nursery was made from several novae.

Q4: Can we tell if any stars near us were made from the same stellar nursery as ours?

Q5: When did the novas occur? If our solar system formed 5 billion years ago, maybe the nova was 6 billion years ago. Maybe there was a flurry of supernovas when the universe was young.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


1. It is difficult to discern what materials originated in nova v supernova. It is probably safe to say the majoritiy of heavy elements in the solar system originated in supernava. If we had a precise accounting of the relative amount of heavy elements in the solar system, we could calculate the relative contribution of star 'guts' to the mass of the solar system. There is no reliable way to estimate the number of stars that contributed to the initial gas / dust cloud from which the solar system originated.

2. The lower mass limit for a supernova progenitor star is thought to be about 8 solar masses. Most of the contributors were probably from much more massive stars. Population ! stars, comprised of primordial gas, may have exceeded 100 solar masses.

3. It was almost certainly a mix from a number, possibly large number of deceased stars.

4. Stellar spectroscopy shows a large number of stars of similar chemistry as the sun in this part of the galaxy. They were not, however, always neighbors. Stars flow in and out of galactic regions over billions of years. Perhaps none of our current neighbors were formed in the same nursery as the sun.

5. Supernova are believed to have been much more common in the early days of our galaxy. We see evidence of this in distant young galaxies in the universe. The spectra of galaxies gives us an indication of their ages.
 


I see. OK. I kept imagining a large star exploding and then recondensing into a stellar nursery. But I see now that novas and stellar nurseries are very different things.

Thank you for your thorough answer.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top