Programs Unsure which second major is better complement.

  • Thread starter Thread starter omagdon7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intersection of biotechnology, nanotechnology, and cellular engineering, with a focus on the optimal academic path for a student majoring in chemical engineering. The individual is considering whether to complement their major with a second major in math or biochemistry, weighing the utility of each for future research and potential startup ambitions. There is a consensus that chemical engineering aligns well with interests in pharmaceuticals and that both chemical and bioengineering can provide relevant knowledge in nanotechnology. However, concerns are raised about the feasibility of starting a company in this field due to high costs associated with necessary specialized equipment, suggesting that significant funding is typically required for successful research and development, often limiting opportunities for small startups.
omagdon7
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I am interested in biotech and nanotech and cellular engineering primarily. After graduation I am definitely going to grad school possibly for MD/PhD. My main career goal is to do research, but ideally I would be head of a start-up company.

So my question is which is probably a better complement to my current primary major, chemical engineering, math or biochemistry. I had initially picked biochemistry but now I think the math might be more useful. What is everyone else's opinion? Which ever I choose as my second major the other field could be taken as a minor also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what is your first major?
 
Chemical Engineering, my decision was initially based on a desire to be in the pharmaceutical industry it seemed most appropriate.
 
I think Bio Engineering and Chem E should probably mesh well. You would probably get some nanotech in chem E, and possibly bio E. I don't think a startup company is too feasible unless you have a lot of money or rich parents. I could see that happening if you make something very small, and does not require a lot of specialized equiptment. The cost of instruments your business will need is going to be through the roof. Thats why big companies or the government does most of the research and not small start up companies.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top