Programs Unsure which second major is better complement.

  • Thread starter Thread starter omagdon7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intersection of biotechnology, nanotechnology, and cellular engineering, with a focus on the optimal academic path for a student majoring in chemical engineering. The individual is considering whether to complement their major with a second major in math or biochemistry, weighing the utility of each for future research and potential startup ambitions. There is a consensus that chemical engineering aligns well with interests in pharmaceuticals and that both chemical and bioengineering can provide relevant knowledge in nanotechnology. However, concerns are raised about the feasibility of starting a company in this field due to high costs associated with necessary specialized equipment, suggesting that significant funding is typically required for successful research and development, often limiting opportunities for small startups.
omagdon7
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I am interested in biotech and nanotech and cellular engineering primarily. After graduation I am definitely going to grad school possibly for MD/PhD. My main career goal is to do research, but ideally I would be head of a start-up company.

So my question is which is probably a better complement to my current primary major, chemical engineering, math or biochemistry. I had initially picked biochemistry but now I think the math might be more useful. What is everyone else's opinion? Which ever I choose as my second major the other field could be taken as a minor also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what is your first major?
 
Chemical Engineering, my decision was initially based on a desire to be in the pharmaceutical industry it seemed most appropriate.
 
I think Bio Engineering and Chem E should probably mesh well. You would probably get some nanotech in chem E, and possibly bio E. I don't think a startup company is too feasible unless you have a lot of money or rich parents. I could see that happening if you make something very small, and does not require a lot of specialized equiptment. The cost of instruments your business will need is going to be through the roof. Thats why big companies or the government does most of the research and not small start up companies.
 
Last edited:
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top