Unveiling the Mysterious 'Black Star': New Astronomical Discovery

  • Thread starter Thread starter rmalik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of a "black star," which is distinct from a black hole. Participants clarify that the term "black star" was historically used for black holes, while current astronomical terminology includes objects like brown dwarfs, which do not undergo hydrogen fusion and can emit radiation. There is skepticism regarding the idea of an object that emits "darkness," as this contradicts the principles of physics. Additionally, the term "black dwarf" refers to a cooled remnant of a white dwarf, though none have formed yet in the universe's current age. The conversation highlights the need for accurate scientific communication and understanding of these astronomical terms.
rmalik
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Is there such a thing as a black star? Not black hole.

I read something from a national geographic magazine a few months back that was about an astronomical object. It was all black on the outside, emitted darkness instead of light, and it contained some water. It was some new discovery or something. I may have got some of it wrong, it was a while ago and I can't remember much. Maybe it was a hypothesis :S

If anybody knows what I'm talking about or clear any of this up, that would be great :)
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sure, there are gazillions of them - objects not sufficiently massive to trigger hydrogen fusion in their cores. Jupiter is one example.
 
Black star was an early name for black holes...the latter coined by John Wheeler I believe.
 
rmalik said:
emitted darkness

This doesn't make sense. How could something emit the absence of something? Either you misunderstood the article, or it was written by someone who knows nothing about this kind of thing! As Chronos notes, there are many large objects which are large starlike balls of gas which do not shine under fusion, although they are typically referred to as brown dwarfs. And they do radiate, just like any other black body, so they certainly are not black!

Could you give a reference if you have one? I'd like to see this absurd claim!
 
Naty1 said:
Black star was an early name for black holes...the latter coined by John Wheeler I believe.


Also, a black dwarf is the name given a remnant of a white dwarf after it has cooled sufficiently. However, the Universe is not old enough for any black dwarfs to have formed yet.
 
From wiki-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Star_(semiclassical_gravity )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top